Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Osteometric sorting of commingled human remains.

John E Byrd1, Bradley J Adams

  • 1US Army Central Identification Laboratory, Hawaii, Hickam AFB, 96853, USA. byrdj@cilhi.army.mil

Journal of Forensic Sciences
|July 25, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Letter to the Editor commenting on "Incorrect formula for calculation of likelihood ratios used in forensic anthropology: Comments on Scott & Rogers (2026)'', by Morrison.

Forensic science international·2026
Same author

A geospatial analysis of subway-related fatalities in New York City (2008-2021).

Journal of forensic sciences·2025
Same author

Cervicothoracic junction in disaster victim identification: Idiosyncrasies and relevance of body position for advanced chest radiograph comparisons.

Journal of forensic sciences·2023
Same author

Radiographic age estimation based on degenerative changes of vertebrae.

Journal of forensic sciences·2023
Same author

Infracranial radiographic comparison for human identification: A study of image quality and tissue shielding effects.

Journal of forensic sciences·2021
Same author

Infra-cranial radiographic comparison for human identification: A study of analyst expertise.

Journal of forensic sciences·2021

Osteometric sorting objectively sorts bones using size and shape measurements. This validated method aids anthropologists in analyzing commingled skeletal remains with statistical models.

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Anthropology
  • Bioarchaeology
  • Skeletal Biology

Background:

  • Commingled skeletal remains present significant challenges in identification.
  • Traditional sorting methods can be subjective and time-consuming.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To formally describe and validate the method of osteometric sorting.
  • To demonstrate the utility of osteometric sorting with case examples.
  • To present regression models applicable to osteometric sorting.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizes quantitative measurements of bone size and shape.
  • Employs statistical models for objective classification.
  • Applies regression analysis for comparative data.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Osteometric sorting provides an objective framework for differentiating skeletal elements.
  • Case examples illustrate the method's effectiveness in sorting commingled remains.
  • Regression models enhance the precision of osteometric sorting.

Conclusions:

  • Osteometric sorting is a valuable, objective tool for analyzing commingled skeletal assemblages.
  • The method enhances the anthropologist's ability to process complex skeletal materials.
  • Advocates for the integration of osteometric sorting into standard anthropological practice.