Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Acoustic feature extraction by cross-correlation in crickets?

R M Hennig1

  • 1Abt. Verhaltensphysiologie, Institut für Biologie, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstr. 43, 10 115 Berlin, Germany. matthias.hennig@rz.hu-berlin.de

Journal of Comparative Physiology. A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology
|July 25, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multivariate female preference tests reveal latent perceptual biases.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2016
Same author

Phenotypic variation and covariation indicate high evolvability of acoustic communication in crickets.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2015
Same author

Conservation of multivariate female preference functions and preference mechanisms in three species of trilling field crickets.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2015
Same author

Calling song signals and temporal preference functions in the cricket Teleogryllus leo.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2012
Same author

Temporal resolution for calling song signals by female crickets, Gryllus bimaculatus.

Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology·2011
Same author

Phase response curves elucidating the dynamics of coupled oscillators.

Methods in enzymology·2009

Crickets use distinct auditory filters for species recognition. A change in neural processing time windows, not templates, explains how these different filters evolved, maintaining reproductive isolation.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroethology
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Auditory Neuroscience

Background:

  • Acoustic feature extraction in vertebrates and insects typically involves temporal filters tuned to specific periodicities.
  • Crickets exhibit selective responses to conspecific song patterns, suggesting a matched filter for specific periods.
  • Homologous neuronal circuits in closely related species are expected to have similar pattern analysis properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the fundamental filter properties underlying auditory pattern analysis in two sibling cricket species, Teleogryllus oceanicus and T. commodus.
  • To understand the evolutionary mechanisms driving the divergence of homologous neuronal circuits for pattern analysis during speciation.
  • To explain how distinct filter properties contribute to reproductive isolation between species.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Behavioral analysis of cricket responses to conspecific song patterns.
  • Modeling auditory signal analysis using cross-correlation to compare external patterns with internal templates.
  • Comparison of behavioral data with cross-correlation values to infer filter properties and evolutionary transitions.

Main Results:

  • Teleogryllus oceanicus females possess a period filter, while T. commodus females exhibit a pulse duration filter.
  • Both species share similar internal templates for song pattern recognition.
  • Significant differences were found in the neural evaluation time windows: 180-400 ms for T. oceanicus and 90-160 ms for T. commodus.

Conclusions:

  • A simple change in the neural evaluation time window can account for the divergent auditory feature extraction observed between these cricket species.
  • Cross-correlation provides a viable model for explaining differences in pattern selectivity and the evolutionary transition of auditory processing.
  • Variations in neural processing time windows are sufficient to maintain species isolation through distinct acoustic communication channels.