Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visually induced cycloversion and cyclovergence.

L J van Rijn1, J van der Steen, H Collewijn

  • 1Department of Physiology I, Faculty of Medicine, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Vision Research
|October 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

What if it is the eyes? The effect of eye movement disorders on cognitive testing in MS.

Journal of neurology·2026
Same author

Detection of visual field defects using Eye Movement Pediatric Perimetry in children with intracranial lesions: feasibility and applicability.

Heliyon·2022
Same author

The prevalence of internuclear ophthalmoparesis in a population-based cohort of individuals with multiple sclerosis.

Multiple sclerosis and related disorders·2022
Same author

A haploscope based binocular pupillometer system to quantify the dynamics of direct and consensual Pupillary Light Reflex.

Scientific reports·2021
Same author

Impaired saccadic eye movements in multiple sclerosis are related to altered functional connectivity of the oculomotor brain network.

NeuroImage. Clinical·2021
Same author

The relation between visual orienting functions, daily visual behaviour and visuoperceptual performance in children with (suspected) cerebral visual impairment.

Research in developmental disabilities·2021
Same journal

Editorial for VSI Amblyopia: Advances in Amblyopia Research.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Human subjects showed similar, low gains for binocular torsional eye movements (cycloversion and cyclovergence). Cycloversion responded instantly, while cyclovergence had a delay, with pattern type having minimal impact.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Ophthalmology
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Binocular eye movements, specifically cyclorotatory (torsional) movements, are crucial for maintaining stable visual perception.
  • Understanding the distinct mechanisms of conjugate cycloversion and disjunctive cyclovergence is essential for diagnosing and treating visual disorders.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To directly compare conjugate cycloversion and disjunctive cyclovergence in human subjects.
  • To investigate the influence of visual pattern characteristics and motion parameters on these torsional eye movements.

Main Methods:

  • Scleral induction coils were used to record binocular cyclorotatory eye movements in human participants.
  • Subjects were exposed to visual patterns oscillating sinusoidally in the frontal plane (0.2 Hz, 2-8 deg amplitude).

Related Experiment Videos

  • In-phase and out-of-phase oscillations were employed to differentiate between cycloversion and cyclovergence.

    • Main Results:

    • Both cycloversion and cyclovergence exhibited low gains (approximately 0.2), indicating limited magnitude of torsional response.
    • Cycloversion showed no discernible time lag, whereas cyclovergence demonstrated a significant delay of about 600 milliseconds.
    • Non-fusible patterns effectively elicited cycloversion but not cyclovergence; the specific nature of the visual pattern had minimal effect on response magnitude.

    Conclusions:

    • Cycloversion and cyclovergence are distinct torsional eye movement responses with differing temporal characteristics and pattern sensitivity.
    • The findings suggest separate neural pathways or processing mechanisms for conjugate and disjunctive torsional eye movements.
    • Visual pattern complexity has a limited role in modulating the gain of these torsional responses.