Related Experiment Videos
Update on Cochrane data on paediatric respiratory diseases
Malcolm G Semple1, Rosalind L Smyth
1Institute of Child Health, University of Liverpool, Alder Hey, Eaton Road, L12 2AP, Liverpool, UK.
Insights
Cochrane systematic reviews offer valuable insights for pediatric pulmonology, with most confirming or refuting existing practices. However, clinicians should note that a lack of evidence does not equate to evidence of absence, especially when extrapolating adult data to children.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Pulmonology
- Evidence-Based Medicine
- Systematic Reviews
Background:
- Systematic reviews synthesize high-quality clinical trial data to inform medical practice.
- The Cochrane Collaboration is a leading organization in developing and disseminating systematic reviews globally.
- This study focuses on identifying and summarizing Cochrane systematic reviews pertinent to pediatric pulmonology.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and summarize Cochrane systematic reviews relevant to pediatric pulmonology.
- To assess the contribution of existing systematic reviews to the field of pediatric respiratory medicine.
Main Methods:
- An expert search of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted.
- The search utilized a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free-text terms related to pediatric respiratory diseases.
- Systematic reviews were pragmatically excluded and then sorted by disease category.
Main Results:
- The search identified 120 reviews specific to pediatric pulmonary interventions and 327 reviews applicable to both pediatric and adult pulmonary diseases.
- After exclusions, 81 reviews were categorized by disease, with 59 discussed in detail.
- The majority of included reviews (69%) provided evidence supporting or refuting established practices.
Conclusions:
- Numerous systematic reviews significantly contribute to pediatric pulmonology.
- A substantial portion of reviews found evidence confirming or refuting accepted practices.
- Clinicians must differentiate between lack of evidence and evidence of absence, and exercise caution when applying adult-derived systematic review conclusions to pediatric populations.
Introduction:
Systematic reviews seek to describe and summarise the best evidence for a given intervention by pooling data from relevant quality clinical trials. The Cochrane Collaboration has fostered the development and dissemination of systematic reviews throughout the world. We have identified and summarised The Cochrane systematic reviews of relevance to the paediatric pulmonologist.
Methods:
We performed an expert search of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews using a combination of medical subject headings and free text terms relating to paediatric respiratory disease.
Results:
The search identified 120 systematic reviews with interventions specific to children with some relevance to pulmonary disease, and 327 reviews with interventions relating to pulmonary disease in adults and children. After pragmatic exclusions, 81 reviews were sorted by disease and 59 of these are discussed in detail.
Conclusions:
There are now many systematic reviews that make a positive contribution to paediatric pulmonology. The majority of reviews (69%) found evidence that either confirmed or refuted an accepted practice. The remaining reviews concluded that the evidence for an accepted practice is poor and sometimes wholly absent. Clinicians must be aware that lack of evidence of effect is not the same as evidence of lack of effect. Caution must be exercised before applying the conclusions of systematic reviews based upon adult data to childhood disease.
Related Concept Videos
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease
Common Respiratory Disorders
Upper respiratory disorders impact the airways above the vocal cords, encompassing areas like the nose, sinuses, and throat. Various conditions fall under this category, including the common cold and allergic rhinitis. These disorders can stem from several causes,...
Drugs Used in Lower Respiratory Disorders: Overview
Bronchodilators, the first step of respiration enhancement, come in various forms, each with its own mechanism...
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
Acute Respiratory Failure-II
The underlying physiological abnormalities that contribute to hypoxemic respiratory failure include:
Respiratory Volumes and Capacities