Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hypothesis testing III: counts and medians.

Kimberly E Applegate1, Richard Tello, Jun Ying

  • 1Department of Radiology, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

Radiology
|July 26, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pd-Catalyzed Regioselective Activation of <i>gem</i>-Difluorinated Spiro[2.2]pentanes: An Approach to 2-Fluorinated 1,3-Dienes.

Organic letters·2026
Same author

Differential Transcriptome Analysis of Intrauterine UPD6pat Fetuses With Distinct Phenotypes.

Molecular genetics & genomic medicine·2026
Same author

Service Year-Dependent Disruption of Reproductive Hormones and Altered DNA Methylation in Male Firefighters.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2026
Same author

Assessing PRISM context domains and RE-AIM outcomes: data from use of the iterative PRISM webtool.

Implementation science communications·2026
Same author

Multimodal data integration in orthopedic regenerative medicine: bridging imaging, omics, and clinical data.

Frontiers in cell and developmental biology·2026
Same author

Palladium-catalyzed direct amination of <i>N</i>-(quinolin-8-yl)-1<i>H</i>-indole-3-carboxamides.

Organic & biomolecular chemistry·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Prediction of Lobar Emphysema Progression with a CT-Based Foundational Model.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Associations of MRI-derived Paraspinal IMAT and LMM with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Results from a German Cohort.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum for: Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

Redefining the Clinical Role of MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

To Ablate or Not to Ablate: The Colorectal Liver Metastasis Question.

Radiology·2026
Same journal

The Limits of Radiologic Categorization in Pulmonary Nonsolid Nodules.

Radiology·2026
See all related articles

This article explains nonparametric statistical tests for radiology research when data are not normally distributed or are categorical. Understanding these tests, like the chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U, is crucial for interpreting study findings accurately.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging and Radiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Radiology research frequently involves analyzing the accuracy of diagnoses and the presence or absence of imaging signs.
  • Interpreting statistical evidence in medical literature requires understanding the underlying analytical methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe essential nonparametric statistical tests for radiology research.
  • To guide researchers in selecting appropriate statistical methods when data deviate from normal distributions or are categorical.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of nonparametric tests for analyzing 2x2 contingency tables of categorical data, including the chi-squared test, Fisher exact test, and McNemar test.
  • Explanation of nonparametric tests for comparing paired continuous samples, such as the Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and sign test.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Highlighting these tests as alternatives to parametric t-tests when t-test assumptions are not met.

    • Main Results:

    • Nonparametric tests provide valid analyses for non-normally distributed or categorical data in radiology.
    • Specific tests are recommended based on data type (categorical vs. continuous) and sample pairing.

    Conclusions:

    • A foundational understanding of nonparametric statistical tests is vital for radiologists to critically evaluate research.
    • Proper application of these statistical methods ensures the accurate interpretation of diagnostic accuracy and imaging sign presence in radiological studies.