Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Scientific research. Publications and behavioural ethics].

F P Schena

    Giornale Italiano Di Nefrologia : Organo Ufficiale Della Societa Italiana Di Nefrologia
    |July 26, 2003
    PubMed
    Summary

    The publish or perish culture pressures researchers, especially early-career scientists, impacting job prospects. This editorial explores publication challenges, including negative results and reviewer bias, in the post-genomic era.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    NMR-based metabolomic study of Apulian Coratina extra virgin olive oil extracted with a combined ultrasound and thermal conditioning process in an industrial setting.

    Food chemistry·2020
    Same author

    Multiple rare genetic variants co-segregating with familial IgA nephropathy all act within a single immune-related network.

    Journal of internal medicine·2016
    Same author

    Patient classification and outcome prediction in IgA nephropathy.

    Computers in biology and medicine·2015
    Same author

    Please advise on infusing hydrochloric acid.

    Clinical kidney journal·2015
    Same author

    Pre-eclampsia before 20-week gestation: diagnosis, investigation and management.

    Clinical kidney journal·2015
    Same author

    Lymphoma presenting as Henoch-Schönlein purpura.

    Clinical kidney journal·2015

    Area of Science:

    • Scientific Publishing
    • Research Integrity
    • Academic Careers

    Background:

    • The 'publish or perish' paradigm creates significant pressure on investigators, particularly early-career scientists, linking job security to publication quantity and quality.
    • Publication processes can be influenced by various factors, including potential conflicts of interest among peer reviewers and the presence of negative study data.
    • The post-genomic era has increased the likelihood of obtaining negative results, posing unique challenges for scientific dissemination.

    Discussion:

    • Investigating the complex interplay between research output, academic advancement, and publication biases.
    • Analyzing how peer review dynamics and the reporting of negative findings impact scientific discourse.
    • Examining the ethical considerations and systemic pressures within academic publishing.

    Key Insights:

    • The 'publish or perish' dilemma is exacerbated by factors beyond research quality, such as reviewer interests and the prevalence of negative data.
    • Negative results, more common in the post-genomic era, present a significant challenge to traditional publication metrics and career progression.
    • Publication politics and the inherent biases within the peer-review system require careful consideration by editors and researchers alike.

    Outlook:

    • Encouraging the publication of negative results to foster a more comprehensive scientific record.
    • Re-evaluating traditional metrics of scientific success beyond publication counts.
    • Promoting transparent and equitable peer-review processes to mitigate bias and support diverse research findings.

    Related Experiment Videos