Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Barriers to translating evidence into practice.

Sean Berenholtz1, Peter J Pronovost

  • 1Departments of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.

Current Opinion in Critical Care
|July 29, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Wrong-Patient Blood Transfusion Error: Leveraging Technology to Overcome Human Error in Intraoperative Blood Component Administration.

Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety·2018
Same author

Sensor-based measurement of critical care nursing workload: Unobtrusive measures of nursing activity complement traditional task and patient level indicators of workload to predict perceived exertion.

PloS one·2018
Same author

Developing and Testing a Chart Abstraction Tool for ICU Quality Measurement.

American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality·2018
Same author

Evaluation of a Measurement System to Assess ICU Team Performance.

Critical care medicine·2018
Same author

In Reply to Khoo and Teo.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2018
Same author

Intensive care unit providers more quickly and accurately assess risk of multiple harms using an engineered safety display.

Health informatics journal·2018
Same journal

How to establish and run a national ICU benchmarking registry.

Current opinion in critical care·2026
Same journal

Cardiogenic shock - toward phenotype-directed, precision management.

Current opinion in critical care·2026
Same journal

The future of critical care nutrition: from calorie counting to precision personalized metabolism therapy.

Current opinion in critical care·2026
Same journal

Editorial introduction.

Current opinion in critical care·2026
Same journal

Generative artificial intelligence for outcome prediction in critical care: the future is now?

Current opinion in critical care·2026
Same journal

Feeding under support in critical care illness: metabolic and nutritional management during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous renal replacement therapy.

Current opinion in critical care·2026
See all related articles

Improving patient outcomes in critical care hinges on effective therapy delivery, not just new treatments. Implementing strategies like teamwork and reduced complexity can enhance physician behavior and quality of care.

Area of Science:

  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Health Services Research
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • Increasing demand for high-quality critical care.
  • Established therapies exist but effective and efficient delivery is under-researched.
  • Focusing on delivery optimization offers cost-effective improvements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review evidence on changing physician behavior.
  • To identify barriers in translating evidence into practice.
  • To provide practical examples of quality improvement strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review on physician behavior change.
  • Analysis of barriers to evidence implementation.
  • Case examples of applying teamwork, independent redundancy, and reduced complexity.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Physician behavior change is key to improving care quality.
  • Teamwork, independent redundancy, and reduced complexity are effective strategies.
  • Evidence translation into practice faces significant barriers.

Conclusions:

  • Quality improvement is multidimensional; no single approach suffices.
  • ICU physicians and leaders must champion a combined strategy.
  • Developing robust patient care systems is essential.