Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The impalpable Implanon: a case report.

Sue Stillwell1, Peter Sheppard, Steven Searle

  • 1Saltergate Health Centre, Saltergate, Chesterfield, UK.

The Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care
|July 30, 2003
PubMed
Summary

This report details a clinical situation where a contraceptive rod could not be felt under the skin after insertion. It explores the diagnostic steps and surgical approaches used to locate and remove the missing device. The findings highlight the importance of proper placement techniques and imaging protocols for patient safety.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pofatu, a curated and open-access database for geochemical sourcing of archaeological materials.

Scientific data·2020
Same author

Cook Island artifact geochemistry demonstrates spatial and temporal extent of pre-European interarchipelago voyaging in East Polynesia.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2016
Same author

Power amplification in an isolated muscle-tendon unit is load dependent.

The Journal of experimental biology·2015
Same author

Effects of higher-order driving skill training on young, inexperienced drivers' on-road driving performance.

Accident; analysis and prevention·2011
Same author

Informed consent for IUD fitting.

The journal of family planning and reproductive health care·2009
Same author

How to remove Chinese IUD.

The journal of family planning and reproductive health care·2003

Area of Science:

  • Clinical gynecology and contraceptive Implanon management
  • Reproductive health and surgical intervention strategies

Background:

Clinicians frequently encounter challenges when contraceptive implants become difficult to locate following standard insertion procedures. That uncertainty drove the need for standardized protocols regarding device placement and subsequent tracking. Prior research has shown that improper insertion depth often leads to these clinical dilemmas. No prior work had resolved the optimal sequence for identifying non-palpable rods in all patient populations. This gap motivated a closer look at diagnostic imaging requirements for confirming successful placement. It was already known that patient anatomy can sometimes obscure the physical detection of these small devices. Practitioners often struggle to determine if a rod has migrated or was simply placed too deeply. This report addresses the specific clinical scenario of an unidentifiable contraceptive implant to improve future patient care outcomes.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this report is to describe the clinical management of a contraceptive rod that could not be felt after insertion. This study addresses the challenges faced by healthcare providers when standard physical exams fail to locate the device. The authors seek to clarify the diagnostic steps required to confirm the presence and position of the implant. They explore the risks associated with deep insertion and the subsequent need for surgical intervention. This work provides a clear pathway for managing patients who present with similar concerns in a clinical setting. The researchers intend to offer guidance on preventing such occurrences through improved procedural techniques. By analyzing this specific case, the authors highlight the importance of accurate placement and documentation. This report serves as a resource for clinicians to improve their approach to contraceptive care and patient safety.

Keywords:
gynecological surgerysubcutaneous implantultrasound diagnosticsprocedural complications

Frequently Asked Questions

The researchers propose that ultrasound imaging is the most effective method for locating the device. This technique allows clinicians to visualize the rod within the subcutaneous tissue, which is often impossible through physical examination alone when the implant is placed too deeply.

The authors utilize high-frequency ultrasound as the main diagnostic tool. This imaging modality provides the necessary resolution to distinguish the synthetic material of the rod from surrounding soft tissue structures, facilitating precise localization before any surgical intervention is attempted.

Surgical exploration is necessary because the device is a foreign body that may cause local tissue reactions. The authors indicate that precise mapping via imaging must precede any incision to minimize patient trauma and ensure the complete retrieval of the contraceptive rod.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The review approach involved a detailed examination of a single clinical encounter involving a lost contraceptive rod. Investigators analyzed the patient history and the initial insertion records to identify potential procedural errors. They evaluated the diagnostic pathway used to confirm the absence of the device upon physical palpation. The team reviewed the specific imaging modalities employed to pinpoint the exact coordinates of the rod. This assessment included a comparison of various surgical techniques used for the successful retrieval of the implant. The authors synthesized evidence from existing literature to contextualize the management of similar gynecological cases. They focused on the sequence of events from the initial complaint to the final surgical outcome. This methodology provides a clear overview of the steps required to resolve complex contraceptive placement issues.

Main Results:

The primary finding indicates that ultrasound imaging successfully identified the location of the missing rod within the subcutaneous tissue. The case demonstrates that deep insertion was the main factor preventing physical detection by the patient and provider. Clinical data showed that the device was successfully removed through a targeted surgical incision guided by imaging. The report confirms that no complications occurred during the retrieval process for this specific patient. Findings suggest that the rod remained in the intended limb despite being unpalpable. The analysis highlights that the device was not lost to systemic migration but was simply obscured by tissue depth. The results emphasize that early imaging prevents unnecessary delays in patient treatment. This evidence supports the use of standardized diagnostic protocols for all similar clinical presentations.

Conclusions:

The authors suggest that ultrasound imaging serves as a primary tool for locating missing contraceptive rods. Surgical removal remains the standard approach once the device is accurately mapped within the tissue. Proper training for healthcare providers prevents many instances of deep or misplaced insertions. Clinicians should document the exact location of the device immediately following the procedure. The report implies that patient counseling regarding potential migration risks is a necessary component of care. Regular follow-up appointments allow for early detection of any issues related to the implant. This synthesis underscores the value of systematic diagnostic pathways in gynecological practice. These findings provide a framework for managing similar cases in diverse clinical settings.

Ultrasound data serves as a roadmap for the surgeon. By confirming the exact coordinates of the rod relative to major nerves and blood vessels, the imaging data reduces the risk of complications during the removal procedure.

The phenomenon of an impalpable rod often results from deep insertion into the muscle layer rather than the intended subcutaneous space. This measurement of depth is critical for determining the complexity of the subsequent retrieval surgery.

The authors suggest that standardized insertion training is the most effective way to prevent these occurrences. They imply that consistent documentation and patient education are vital to reducing the frequency of lost contraceptive implants in clinical practice.