Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bladder imaging using multidetector row computed tomography, volume rendering, and magnetic resonance imaging.

Leo P Lawler1, Elliot K Fishman

  • 1Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, JHOC 3254, 601 North Caroline Street, Baltimore, MD 21287-0801, USA. llawler@jhmi.edu

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
|July 30, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Facebook Live: A Free Real-Time Interactive Information Platform.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2017
Same author

Imaging of post-operative pancreas and complications after pancreatic adenocarcinoma resection.

Abdominal radiology (New York)·2017
Same author

From Academia to Government to Industry: A Strange Journey and Its Lessons.

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR·2017
Same author

Appearance of Adrenal Myelolipomas on 2-deoxy-2-(<sup>18</sup>F) fluoro-D-glucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography.

World journal of nuclear medicine·2017
Same author

Persistent SIRS and acute fluid collections are associated with increased CT scanning in acute interstitial pancreatitis.

Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology·2017
Same author

Initial experience with cinematic rendering for chest cardiovascular imaging.

The British journal of radiology·2017

Multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are noninvasive bladder evaluation tools. This review compares MDCT and MRI techniques, highlighting their advantages and limitations in diagnosing bladder pathologies.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Urology

Background:

  • Multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are noninvasive imaging modalities for bladder evaluation.
  • MDCT provides rapid imaging and 3D reconstruction capabilities.
  • MRI offers superior soft-tissue contrast and radiation-free dynamic imaging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the techniques and protocols of MDCT and MRI for bladder assessment.
  • To illustrate the application of both modalities in various bladder pathologies.
  • To delineate the distinct advantages and limitations of MDCT and MRI in bladder imaging.

Main Methods:

  • Review of MDCT techniques, including near-isotropic data sets and volume rendering software.
  • Review of MRI techniques, emphasizing dynamic imaging capabilities.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Case illustrations of bladder pathologies evaluated by both MDCT and MRI.

    • Main Results:

    • MDCT excels in speed and 3D visualization of bladder anatomy.
    • MRI demonstrates superior soft-tissue contrast, crucial for certain pathologies.
    • Both modalities have specific strengths and weaknesses depending on the clinical scenario.

    Conclusions:

    • MDCT and MRI are valuable noninvasive tools for bladder evaluation.
    • The choice between MDCT and MRI depends on the specific diagnostic question.
    • Understanding the advantages and limitations of each modality optimizes bladder pathology assessment.