Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Consider alternative technologies to maintain vascular access devices.

Kelli Rosenthal1

  • 1ResourceNurse.com, Oceanside, NY, USA.

Nursing Management
|July 31, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Researchers explored alternatives to heparin, including valved infusion catheters and positive fluid displacement valves. These methods aim to prevent blood clots in medical devices.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Targeting "never events".

Nursing management·2009
Same author

What you need to know about ports.

Nursing·2008
Same author

Bridging the I.V. access gap with midline catheters.

Nursing·2008
Same author

Reducing the risks of infiltration and extravasation.

Nursing·2007
Same author

Are you up-to-date with the infusion nursing standards?

Nursing·2007
Same author

Avoiding common perils of drug administration.

Nursing·2007
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Medical Devices
  • Vascular Access
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Heparin is commonly used to prevent blood clots in central venous catheters.
  • Heparin use can be associated with complications like heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
  • There is a need for safe and effective alternatives to heparin for catheter patency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate alternative methods for maintaining patency in vascular access devices.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of valved infusion catheters and positive fluid displacement valves as heparin alternatives.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies on valved infusion catheters.
  • Analysis of research on luer-activated positive fluid displacement valves.
  • Comparison of complication rates and effectiveness between heparin and alternative methods.

Main Results:

  • Valved infusion catheters demonstrated effective prevention of catheter occlusion.
  • Positive fluid displacement valves showed comparable efficacy to heparin in preventing reflux and clots.
  • Both alternatives offer potential benefits in reducing heparin-related adverse events.

Conclusions:

  • Valved infusion catheters and positive fluid displacement valves represent viable alternatives to heparin.
  • These devices can improve patient safety by reducing the risk of heparin-induced complications.
  • Further clinical studies are warranted to confirm long-term efficacy and cost-effectiveness.

Related Experiment Videos