Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Tie-overs under pressure.

F K Seymour1, H P Giele

  • 1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Radcliffe Infirmary, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK.

British Journal of Plastic Surgery
|August 2, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The distally based posterior interosseous artery flap should be called the 5, 6 distal inter-compartmental septal artery flap.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2019
Same author

Inter- and intrarater reliability of osteoarthritis classification at the trapeziometacarpal joint.

The Journal of hand surgery·2014
Same author

A prospective case-control study to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the grind and traction-shift (subluxation-relocation) clinical tests in osteoarthritis of the thumb carpometacarpal joint.

The Journal of hand surgery, European volume·2013
Same author

Collagenase for Dupuytren's disease of the thumb.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2012
Same author

Congenital profound hearing loss: management of hypoplastic and aplastic vestibulocochlear nerves.

Cochlear implants international·2011
Same author

Randomized controlled trial of fibrin sealant to reduce postoperative drainage following elective lymph node dissection.

The British journal of surgery·2011
Same journal

British West Indies peregrinations.

British journal of plastic surgery·2010
Same journal

Ten-year review of hypospadias surgery from a single centre.

British journal of plastic surgery·2005
Same journal

Anatomical study of the cutaneous perforator arteries and vascularisation of the biceps femoris muscle.

British journal of plastic surgery·2005
Same journal

Reconstruction of intraoral defects using facial artery musculomucosal flap.

British journal of plastic surgery·2005
Same journal

The distal medial perforators of the lower leg and their accompanying veins.

British journal of plastic surgery·2005
Same journal

Acute exacerbation of macroglossia.

British journal of plastic surgery·2005
See all related articles

Tie-over dressings are commonly used for skin grafts, but this study found they exert no significant pressure at the graft-bed interface. This challenges the presumed mechanism of action for these surgical dressings.

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Wound Healing
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Tie-over dressings are standard for skin grafts, believed to reduce dead space and immobilize grafts via pressure.
  • The precise pressure exerted by these dressings at the graft-bed interface has not been quantitatively measured.
  • Previous assumptions suggest pressure application is key to their effectiveness in graft stabilization and hematoma prevention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively measure the pressure exerted by tie-over dressings at the skin graft-bed interface.
  • To investigate the mechanical forces involved in tie-over dressing application for skin grafts.
  • To validate or refute the presumed mechanism of pressure application in tie-over dressings.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a quantitative analysis to measure pressure at the graft-bed interface.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed specific measurement techniques to assess the forces exerted by tie-over dressings.
  • Focused on the direct interface between the graft and the wound bed.

    • Main Results:

    • The study found that tie-over dressings exert no significant pressure at the graft-bed interface.
    • Quantitative measurements did not support the hypothesis that these dressings apply substantial pressure.
    • The findings indicate a lack of mechanical compression at the critical graft-bed contact area.

    Conclusions:

    • The presumed mechanism of action for tie-over dressings, involving significant pressure application, is not supported by this study's findings.
    • Alternative or additional mechanisms may be responsible for the observed benefits of tie-over dressings in skin grafting.
    • Further research is needed to elucidate the true biomechanical function of tie-over dressings in wound healing and graft success.