Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A review committee's guide for evaluating qualitative proposals.

Janice M Morse1

  • 1University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Qualitative Health Research
|August 2, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Qualitative researchers need better evaluation criteria for funding proposals. This article provides questions to assess relevance, rigor, and feasibility, aiding fair review of qualitative research.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

<i>Conceptual Scaffold Analysis</i> Using Mature Lay Concepts when Constructing Qualitative Theory.

Global qualitative nursing research·2026
Same author

Untenable Expectations: Nurses' Work in the Context of Medication Administration, Error, and the Organization.

Global qualitative nursing research·2022
Same author

The Misfit Between Qualitative Research and Journal Requirements.

Qualitative health research·2021
Same author

Developing the Resilience Framework for Nursing and Healthcare.

Global qualitative nursing research·2021
Same author

Nurse-Delivered Telephone Intervention to Reduce Oral Mucositis and Prevent Dehydration.

Oncology nursing forum·2021
Same author

Anemia Management in Rural Haitian Children: A Mixed Methods Study.

Journal of transcultural nursing : official journal of the Transcultural Nursing Society·2021

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Research Methodology

Background:

  • Qualitative researchers face challenges with quantitative evaluation criteria in funding.
  • A lack of alternative assessment methods hinders fair review of qualitative proposals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the deficit in evaluating qualitative research proposals.
  • To present a framework of criteria for assessing qualitative research.

Main Methods:

  • Development of assessment criteria focusing on relevance, rigor, and feasibility.
  • Framing criteria as guiding questions for reviewers skilled in qualitative methods.

Main Results:

  • A set of questions designed to evaluate the quality of qualitative research.
  • The criteria aim to support comprehensive evaluation and defense of qualitative studies.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed criteria offer a solution for the fair evaluation of qualitative research proposals.
  • These questions empower reviewers to assess and advocate for qualitative research effectively.

Related Experiment Videos