Related Experiment Videos
Resolving public conflict in site selection process-a risk communication approach
Kaoru Ishizaka1, Masaru Tanaka
1Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, 3-1-1, Tsushima-Naka, 700-8530 Okayama, Japan. kaoru55@cc.okayama-u.ac.jp
Waste Management (New York, N.Y.)
|August 2, 2003
Summary
Risk communication strategies can resolve conflicts in waste disposal facility siting in Japan. Implementing these techniques fosters cooperation and efficient waste management, addressing public concerns about dioxins.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Sociology
- Public Policy
Background:
- Conflicts over waste disposal facility siting are frequent in Japan, exacerbated by public concerns regarding dioxins.
- Inefficient siting leads to facility shortages, increased waste management costs, and resource depletion.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose and evaluate the use of risk communication techniques for resolving conflicts in waste disposal facility siting.
- To facilitate information exchange and cooperation between residents and municipalities.
Main Methods:
- A study was conducted involving personal interviews and questionnaires with opposing parties in a town.
- The research focused on resolving conflicts related to selecting a site for a solid waste treatment and disposal facility.
Main Results:
- A risk communication approach was developed based on survey findings.
- Key elements include building social trust, effective communication processes, credible information sources, and environmental education.
Conclusions:
- Risk communication is a pragmatic tool for avoiding conflicts in waste management siting.
- Successful implementation requires social trust, credible information, and public engagement.