Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Expert systems and expert behavior.

W Sumner1, E K Shultz

  • 1Program in Medical Information Science, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03755.

Journal of Medical Systems
|October 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The item generation methodology of an empiric simulation project.

Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice·2005
Same author

Estimating the health consequences of replacing cigarettes with nicotine inhalers.

Tobacco control·2003
Same author

Student documentation of multiple diagnoses in family practice patients using a handheld student encounter log.

Proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2002
Same author

Dominant-negative transcription factor AP-2 augments SB-2 melanoma tumor growth in vivo.

Oncogene·2001
Same author

Choice-matching preference reversals in health outcome assessments.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2001
Same author

Preference for fractures and other glucocorticoid-associated adverse effects among rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2001
Same journal

Starmate: A Lightweight AI Assistant for Autism Caregivers Developed and Evaluated Through a User-Centered Mixed-Methods Framework.

Journal of medical systems·2026
Same journal

Predicting the Predictor: Unresolved Validity Threats in LLM-Based ASA Classification.

Journal of medical systems·2026
Same journal

Development and Internal Validation of a Vectorcardiography-Augmented Model for 12-Month Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Chronic Heart Failure.

Journal of medical systems·2026
Same journal

Development and Validation of an Automated Acute Kidney Injury E-Alert System Integrated with Clinical Decision Support for Hospitalized Patients.

Journal of medical systems·2026
Same journal

Calibration of Self-Reported Confidence and Accuracy of Large Language Models in Medical Question Answering.

Journal of medical systems·2026
Same journal

Throughput Benchmarking and Throughput Variance Analysis to Evaluate the Efficiency of an Outpatient Endoscopy Unit.

Journal of medical systems·2026
See all related articles

Computer diagnostic knowledge bases like Iliad 4.0 and QMR 2.03 show potential for medical decision support but are not yet expert diagnostic consultants. They struggle with recognizing limitations and interpreting complex data compared to human experts.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Informatics
  • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Background:

  • Computer-based diagnostic knowledge bases (KB) offer decision support in medicine.
  • Existing systems like Iliad 4.0 and QMR 2.03 have been evaluated for their capabilities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the readiness of Iliad 4.0 and QMR 2.03 as expert diagnostic consultants.
  • To identify limitations of current diagnostic knowledge bases in emulating human expert performance.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of computer-based knowledge bases against human expert diagnostic processes.
  • Evaluation of system performance in areas such as self-awareness of limitations, data interpretation, and test selection.

Main Results:

  • Neither Iliad 4.0 nor QMR 2.03 are currently capable of serving as expert diagnostic consultants.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identified limitations include: recognizing system limitations, interpreting continuous data, recognizing dependent findings, selecting appropriate tests, and describing test impact.

    • Conclusions:

    • Computer-based diagnostic knowledge bases require significant improvements to match human expert diagnostic capabilities.
    • Future development should focus on enhancing self-awareness, data interpretation, and clinical reasoning within these systems.