Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2026

Anogenital Distance and Perineal Measurements of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) Quantification System
Published on: September 20, 2018
The birth interval hypothesis-does it really indicate the end of the primipaternity hypothesis
Gus Dekker1, Pierre Yves Robillard
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Adelaide, Lyell McEwin Hospital, SA 5112 Elizabeth Vale, Australia. gustaaf.dekker@adelaide.edu.au
Recent Norwegian data suggest the presence of a causal relationship between prolonged birth intervals and the risk for preeclampsia in subsequent pregnancies. It has been proposed that the birth interval data explain the known association between a change in paternity and the risk for preeclampsia. In this review, the authors explore alternative explanations for the Norwegian findings, and as such argue that there is currently no reason to reject the primipaternity hypothesis.
Recent Norwegian data suggest the presence of a causal relationship between prolonged birth intervals and the risk for preeclampsia in subsequent pregnancies. It has been proposed that the birth interval data explain the known association between a change in paternity and the risk for preeclampsia. In this review, the authors explore alternative explanations for the Norwegian findings, and as such argue that there is currently no reason to reject the primipaternity hypothesis.
Related Concept Videos
Nondisjunction
Nondisjunction
Ovarian Cycle
Regression Toward the Mean
Probability Laws
Oogenesis