Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Victor M Montori1, Marc F Swiontkowski, Deborah J Cook

  • 1Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. montori.victor@mayo.edu

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
|August 5, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Short-term intravenous fluids for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (the STRIPE study): protocol for a five-arm randomised controlled trial.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Cost-Effectiveness of Pantoprazole to Prevent Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

JAMA network open·2025
Same author

Frailty and the risk of ICU-acquired infections in a randomised trial: a protocol and statistical analysis plan.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Protocol for an economic evaluation alongside the Re-Evaluating the Inhibition of Stress Erosions (E-REVISE) trial.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Methylene Blue Administration in Septic Shock: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Critical care medicine·2025
Same author

Cost-Effectiveness of In-Bed Cycling and Routine Physiotherapy for Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation.

JAMA network open·2025
Same journal

Impact Microindentation Evaluates Bone Strength, Bone Quality, and Fracture Susceptibility Across Skeletal Sites: A Cadaver Study.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

What Is the Effect of Robot Reduction in Displaced Pelvic Fractures? A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

CORR Insights®: Acute or Delayed TKA for Tibial Plateau Fracture? An Observational Study From the Swedish Arthroplasty Register.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

Reply to the Letter to the Editor: Guest Editorial: Recalling a Recall.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

Radial Head Fractures Cluster in the Anterolateral and Anteromedial Quadrants and Do Not Correlate With Coronoid Fracture Types.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
Same journal

Reduced Cerebellar Activation With Eyes Closed Is Associated With Delayed Peroneal Reaction Time in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Clinical orthopaedics and related research·2026
See all related articles

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are increasingly important evidence sources. Understanding their methodology enhances critical appraisal skills for clinicians and researchers.

Area of Science:

  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Clinical research methodology

Background:

  • Systematic reviews are growing in prevalence.
  • They differ from narrative reviews through specific methodologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To define systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
  • To highlight their importance as evidence sources.
  • To encourage familiarity with their construction and use.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive literature searches.
  • Explicit study selection criteria.
  • Methodologic quality assessment.
  • Synthesis of study results (qualitative or quantitative).

Main Results:

  • Systematic reviews address specific clinical questions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Meta-analyses quantitatively pool results from multiple studies.
  • Collaborative efforts exist for producing high-quality reviews.

    • Conclusions:

    • Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are valuable evidence resources.
    • Understanding these methods improves their application.
    • Clinicians, teachers, and investigators benefit from this knowledge.