Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The missing link: on the line between C and E.

Werner B F Brouwer1, Frans F H Rutten

  • 1Department of Health Policy and Management & Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Brouwer@bmg.eur.nl

Health Economics
|August 5, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does timing matter? The role of health information shocks in measuring willingness to pay.

The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care·2025
Same author

Quality of Life and Societal Cost in Autistic Children: An Exploratory Comparative Study Pre- and Post-Diagnosis.

Journal of autism and developmental disorders·2025
Same author

Benefits beyond health in the willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life-year.

The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care·2024
Same author

Construct Validity, Reliability, and Responsiveness of the 10-Item Well-Being Instrument for Use in Economic Evaluation Studies.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2024
Same author

From Health to Well-Being: Toward a Monetary Valuation of a Well-Being-Adjusted Life-Year.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2024
Same author

Development and psychometric evaluation of the Transdiagnostic Decision Tool: matched care for patients with a mental disorder in need of highly specialised care.

BJPsych open·2023
Same journal

Lead in Drinking Water and Child Health: Evidence From Jackson, Mississippi.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

Health on the Move: The Impact of Poverty Alleviation Relocation on Healthcare Utilization in China.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

The Effects of Compulsory Licensing: A Case Study of HIV Drugs.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

Beyond Tobacco Prevention: The Effects of Tobacco 21 Laws on Young Adults' Body Weight.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

Assessing the Estimands and Estimates of Hospitalization Rates in Health Economics and Clinical Medicine.

Health economics·2026
Same journal

The Impact of Unemployment Insurance Benefit Cuts on Mental Health: Evidence From Early Pandemic Program Expirations.

Health economics·2026
See all related articles

Patient time valuation in health economics is inconsistent, impacting cost-benefit analysis. Using specific patient group preferences for health states could improve accuracy over general public valuations.

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes
  • Time Valuation Studies

Background:

  • Current health economic evaluations often fail to consistently account for patient time, affecting cost and effect calculations.
  • Elements like lost income, unpaid work, leisure, and role functioning are inconsistently separated in time-based analyses.
  • The discrepancy between patient-specific costs and general public preferences for health states complicates accurate valuation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the inconsistencies in separating patient time elements in health economic evaluations.
  • To examine the challenges posed by using general versus specific preferences in health state assessments.
  • To propose an alternative approach for more accurate time valuation in health economics.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of current practices in health economic evaluations regarding time valuation.
  • Comparison of cost calculations specific to patient groups versus effect estimations based on general public preferences.
  • Exploration of the mismatch in time-use characteristics between patient cohorts and the general public.

Main Results:

  • Inconsistent separation of patient time elements (income, unpaid work, leisure) is prevalent.
  • Using general public preferences for health states, instead of patient-specific ones, creates a disconnect in valuation.
  • This discrepancy hinders the accurate separation of time elements into costs and effects.

Conclusions:

  • The inconsistent separation of patient time elements leads to difficulties in accurately assessing costs and effects in health economics.
  • General health state valuations do not adequately capture the time-use characteristics of specific patient groups.
  • Employing specific time-group valuations for health states offers a potentially superior alternative to general valuations for improved accuracy.