Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Extending decision support: preparation and implementation.

Karen R Sepucha1, Albert G Mulley

  • 1Health Decision Research Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA. ksepucha@partners.org

Patient Education and Counseling
|August 6, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Feasibility and acceptability of an electronic decision aid for genetic testing in ovarian and pancreatic cancer patients.

Research connections·2026
Same author

Novel approach to teaching empathic leadership using heuristics.

BMJ leader·2026
Same author

Development and psychometric evaluation of a decision quality instrument for lung cancer screening decisions (DQI-LCS).

BMC medical informatics and decision making·2026
Same author

Practice, Policy, and Research Recommendations to Improve Decision-Making about Surgery for People Living with Dementia: A Delphi Panel Consensus.

Annals of surgery·2026
Same author

Can Patients Differentiate Responses by Orthopaedic Surgeons and ChatGPT Regarding Total Hip Arthroplasty?

The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons·2025
Same author

Patient and Caregiver Experiences with Surgical Decision-Making in the Context of Dementia.

Annals of surgery·2025
Same journal

Exploring surgical patients' health literacy following the use of a patient safety checklist - A qualitative study.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same journal

Virga and the future of motivational interviewing: Issues in training counseling skills.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same journal

Informed choices: Patients' and healthcare professionals' perspectives on high-risk prostate cancer treatment decision-making.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same journal

Factors influencing patients switching back to physical channels for health consultations.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same journal

Challenges in advising people with severe mental illness to quit smoking: A conversation analysis of patient resistance.

Patient education and counseling·2026
Same journal

Alleviating the burden: The impact of interpersonal and digital communication on depressive symptoms in cancer survivors.

Patient education and counseling·2026
See all related articles

Patient decision aids need improvement. This study highlights the importance of adequate preparation before presenting information and providing implementation support to enhance patient decision-making quality.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Decision Science
  • Patient Engagement Strategies

Background:

  • The healthcare landscape is shifting towards patient-centered care models.
  • Current patient decision aids primarily focus on information provision and value clarification.
  • Existing decision aids may lack crucial components for optimizing decision quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify essential elements missing in current patient decision aids.
  • To propose improvements for enhancing the quality of patient decision-making.
  • To address the need for innovative and flexible decision-making models in healthcare.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and conceptual analysis of existing patient decision aids.
  • Identification of key components for effective shared decision-making.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of two critical elements: adequate preparation and implementation support.

    • Main Results:

    • Current decision aids often precede option and outcome information before adequate patient preparation.
    • Implementation support, a crucial aspect for decision execution, is frequently neglected.
    • Focusing solely on information and values is insufficient for high-quality decisions.

    Conclusions:

    • Patient decision aids require enhancement beyond information and value clarification.
    • Integrating adequate preparation phases and robust implementation support is vital.
    • Optimizing decision aids will lead to improved patient-centered care and decision quality.