Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

General practitioners' views on shared decision making: a qualitative analysis.

Fiona A Stevenson1

  • 1Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Guy's, King's, and St Thomas' School of Medicine, Kings College, London, UK. f.stevenson@pcps.ucl.ac.uk

Patient Education and Counseling
|August 6, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Shared decision making (SDM) is often not practiced despite its importance. General practitioners (GPs) need support to overcome barriers and integrate patient involvement into consultations effectively.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Bridging the gap in the UK's National Health Service integrated care systems: insights from a mixed methods implementation evaluation of UCLP-PRIMROSE, a care innovation to reduce physical health inequalities for people with severe mental illness.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

What is the impact of a shift to remote consultations? A qualitative interview study in primary and secondary healthcare.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Awareness of risk when prescribing and taking combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs): a qualitative study with women and health professionals in three European countries.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Using normalisation process theory to evaluate the implementation of a digital health intervention in community and secondary care long COVID clinics.

BMJ open·2024
Same author

A qualitative exploration of the barriers and facilitators to self-managing multiple long-term conditions amongst people experiencing socioeconomic deprivation.

Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy·2024
Same author

Interventions to improve perinatal outcomes among migrant women in high-income countries: a systematic review protocol.

BMJ open·2023

Area of Science:

  • General Practice
  • Healthcare Communication
  • Patient Engagement

Background:

  • Shared decision making (SDM) is advocated to enhance patient partnership in consultations.
  • However, the practical implementation of SDM faces challenges, particularly concerning general practitioners' (GPs) perspectives and cooperation.
  • Previous research often relied on simulated patients, limiting insights into real-world practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore general practitioners' (GPs) views on the practical application of shared decision making (SDM).
  • To identify perceived barriers and facilitators to implementing SDM in routine consultations.
  • To ground discussions on SDM in the real-life experiences of GPs and patients.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized focus group discussions involving GPs and patients.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Incorporated data from actual consultations and interviews with patients and GPs.
  • Facilitated discussions on the definition of SDM, treatment negotiation, patient viewpoints, and barriers.
  • Main Results:

    • Agreement with SDM in principle does not guarantee its practice.
    • GPs' perspectives are crucial for understanding the gap between SDM theory and practice.
    • Focus groups provided a platform for GPs to reflect on their practice and patient interactions.

    Conclusions:

    • Translating the theory of SDM into practice requires addressing GPs' concerns and perceived barriers.
    • The developed process aims to create a supportive environment for GPs to enhance patient participation.
    • Further development is needed to establish effective techniques for increasing patient involvement in decision-making.