Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Escape from X inactivation.

C M Disteche1, G N Filippova, K D Tsuchiya

  • 1Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195, USA. cdistech@u.washington.edu

Cytogenetic and Genome Research
|August 6, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Orientation-dependent Dxz4 contacts shape the 3D structure of the inactive X chromosome.

Nature communications·2018
Same author

RET is a potential tumor suppressor gene in colorectal cancer.

Oncogene·2012
Same author

ISCN standard idiograms.

Current protocols in human genetics·2008
Same author

Chromosome banding techniques.

Current protocols in human genetics·2008
Same author

Epigenetic silencing of the intronic microRNA hsa-miR-342 and its host gene EVL in colorectal cancer.

Oncogene·2008
Same author

Multiple fetal anomalies associated with subtle subtelomeric chromosomal rearrangements.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2003
Same journal

Genomic Organization of Ribosomal DNA and Karyotypic Diversity in Vicia sativa and Vicia villosa.

Cytogenetic and genome research·2026
Same journal

George Martin and Werner's Syndrome.

Cytogenetic and genome research·2026
Same journal

The Spectrum of Mosaic Double Aneuploidy of Monosomy X and Trisomy 18: Two New Cases and Review of the Literature.

Cytogenetic and genome research·2026
Same journal

Familial Robertsonian Translocation, rob(14;21), with High Risk for Down Syndrome.

Cytogenetic and genome research·2026
Same journal

Radiosensitivity and Bystander Response in X-Ray-Irradiated Tumour and Normal Epithelial Cells of Breast and Prostate Origin.

Cytogenetic and genome research·2026
Same journal

Cytogenetic Profile of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia in South India: A Series of 1,819 Patients from a Single Centre.

Cytogenetic and genome research·2026
See all related articles

Mammalian X inactivation silences most X chromosome genes, but some escape. This review explores the evolutionary, molecular, and epigenetic factors influencing X-inactivation escape genes.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Developmental Biology
  • Evolutionary Biology

Background:

  • X inactivation is a key process in mammalian cells, silencing most genes on one X chromosome.
  • Certain genes on the inactivated X chromosome escape this silencing, presenting a unique biological puzzle.
  • Understanding these escape genes is crucial for insights into gene silencing and protective mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the evolutionary aspects of X inactivation escape in relation to sex chromosome divergence.
  • To present the molecular characteristics, expression patterns, and epigenetic modifications of X inactivation escape genes.
  • To discuss the developmental regulation and chromatin domain implications in modeling the escape process.

Main Methods:

  • This is a review article, synthesizing existing research.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of evolutionary divergence of sex chromosomes.
  • Examination of molecular and epigenetic data for escape genes.
  • Discussion of developmental regulation and chromatin structure.

    • Main Results:

    • Genes escaping X inactivation show varied evolutionary trajectories linked to sex chromosome divergence.
    • Specific molecular signatures and epigenetic marks characterize these escape genes.
    • Developmental stage and chromatin domain organization influence gene escape from X inactivation.
    • These genes offer insights into the boundaries and regulation of chromosome-wide silencing.

    Conclusions:

    • X inactivation escape genes are shaped by evolution and possess distinct molecular and epigenetic features.
    • Their regulation is complex, involving developmental cues and chromatin architecture.
    • Studying these genes provides a window into the mechanisms governing large-scale gene silencing and preservation.