Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Current usage of nonionic contrast.

K D Hopper1, H Lambe, Y L Matthews

  • 1Department of Radiology, Penn State University, Hershey, PA 17033.

Urologic Radiology
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optimization of shaded surface display for CT angiography.

Academic radiology·2001
Same author

Transbronchial biopsy with virtual CT bronchoscopy and nodal highlighting.

Radiology·2001
Same author

CT angiography: in vitro comparison of five reconstruction methods.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2001
Same author

Radioprotection to the eye during CT scanning.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2001
Same author

Biopsy features are associated with primary symptoms in interstitial cystitis: results from the interstitial cystitis database study.

Urology·2001
Same author

Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of volume of low osmolality contrast medium needed for routine helical abdominal CT.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2001
Same journal

Retroaortic renal vein with tumor thrombus: MR findings.

Urologic radiology·1992
Same journal

Tumor thrombus in a retroaortic left renal vein and incidental right circumcaval ureter.

Urologic radiology·1992
Same journal

Hypoechoic renal pyramids: sonographic visualization in older children and young adults.

Urologic radiology·1992
Same journal

Role of ultrasound in medical management of patients with renal stone disease.

Urologic radiology·1992
Same journal

Contemporary concepts for imaging urinary tract obstruction.

Urologic radiology·1992
Same journal

Inguinal mass in a 66-year-old man.

Urologic radiology·1992
See all related articles

Physicians are increasingly using nonionic contrast agents for intravenous studies, with radiologists showing higher adoption rates than nonradiologists. This trend may indicate evolving medical practices in contrast material utilization.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • Intravenous contrast agents are crucial for diagnostic imaging.
  • Nonionic contrast agents offer potential safety benefits over ionic agents.
  • Understanding current usage patterns is important for clinical practice and research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To survey physician usage of nonionic versus ionic contrast agents for intravenous studies.
  • To identify factors influencing the choice between nonionic and ionic contrast agents.
  • To assess the prevalence of nonionic contrast agent use in a diverse physician population.

Main Methods:

  • A survey was distributed to physicians who billed Pennsylvania Blue Shield for intravenous contrast studies in 1989.
  • The survey targeted a diverse group of physicians based on hospital size, practice type, and group size.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Response data from 285 physician groups were analyzed to determine contrast agent utilization patterns.

    • Main Results:

    • Nonionic contrast agents were used in 41.3% of all surveyed intravenous studies.
    • Radiologists utilized nonionic contrast agents significantly more than nonradiologists (P < 0.0001).
    • 40.3% of all surveyed physician groups used nonionic contrast for at least 50% of their patients.

    Conclusions:

    • The utilization of nonionic contrast agents in intravenous studies is substantial and growing.
    • Radiologists are key drivers in the adoption of nonionic contrast agents.
    • Findings may reflect a changing landscape in contrast material use among physicians.