Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Visual categorization: accessing abstraction in non-human primates.

Michèle Fabre-Thorpe1

  • 1Centre de Recherche Cerveau and Cognition (UMR 5549, CNRS-UPS), Facultè de Médecine de Rangueil, 133 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse, France. michele.fabre-thorpe@cerco.ups-tlse.fr

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences
|August 9, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A simple rule to describe interactions between visual categories.

The European journal of neuroscience·2020
Same author

Briefly Flashed Scenes Can Be Stored in Long-Term Memory.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2018
Same author

At 120 msec you can spot the animal but you don't yet know it's a dog.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2014
Same author

Stimulus duration and diversity do not reverse the advantage for superordinate-level representations: the animal is seen before the bird.

The European journal of neuroscience·2014
Same author

Incongruent object/context relationships in visual scenes: where are they processed in the brain?

Brain and cognition·2013
Same author

Animal detection precedes access to scene category.

PloS one·2012
Same journal

The microlandscapes of tree trunks: the effect of lichen and tree-level characteristics on arthropod communities.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Centimetre-scale landscapes to assess the motion behaviour and cognition of gastropods and bivalves.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Intertidal microcosms of wave-swept rocky shores: ecological and physiological insights from a uniquely stressful environment.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Temporal and spatial variation in temperature and oxygen at the microscale: key niche axes for aquatic life.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Natural microcosms in ecology: fulfilling the promise of model systems?

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
Same journal

Microbe-induced galls and plant defence: metabolite crosstalk in a co-evolutionary battle.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2026
See all related articles

Humans and animals share fundamental abstract representation mechanisms, potentially masked by language in humans. This study compares monkey and human cognitive abilities to understand the evolution of abstraction.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Comparative Psychology
  • Evolutionary Psychology

Background:

  • Evolution may have established foundational abstract mental representation capabilities early on.
  • Mammalian and human mental abilities, though differing in sophistication due to language, may share core mechanisms.
  • Sophisticated human strategies might obscure underlying shared cognitive processes with animals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare monkey and human abilities in perceptual tasks, including visual categorization.
  • To assess behavioral similarities and differences between species.
  • To determine the level of abstraction in monkeys' mental representations and explore their neural encoding.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of behavioral data from monkeys and humans in perceptual tasks.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of visual categorization abilities.
  • Exploration of neural processing underlying abstract cognitive operations.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified behavioral similarities and dissimilarities in perceptual tasks between monkeys and humans.
    • Provided insights into the level of abstraction in monkeys' mental representations.
    • Laid groundwork for comparative neural studies on abstract cognition.

    Conclusions:

    • Humans and animals likely utilize common fundamental mechanisms for abstract mental representation.
    • Comparative studies of neural processing are crucial for understanding the evolution and complexity of abstraction.
    • Further research can elucidate the phylogenetic emergence and development of abstract thought.