Interventional or semi-interventional treatment for Budd-Chiari syndrome

Zhang Xiaoming1, Wang Zhonggao

  • 1Dept. of Vascular Surgery, People Hospital of Beijing University, Beijing 100044.

Insights

Interventional techniques effectively treat Budd-Chiari syndrome, with stenting improving outcomes for inferior vena cava (IVC) lesions. Semi-interventional approaches offer solutions for complex cases and PTA failures.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Interventional Radiology
  • Hepatology

Background:

  • Budd-Chiari syndrome involves hepatic venous outflow obstruction.
  • Interventional and semi-interventional techniques are crucial for managing this condition.
  • A diverse range of lesions necessitates varied treatment strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of interventional and semi-interventional techniques in 173 Budd-Chiari syndrome patients.
  • To compare outcomes of different treatment modalities.
  • To identify optimal treatment pathways based on lesion type.

Main Methods:

  • 173 patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome underwent various interventions.
  • Procedures included percutaneous transinferior vena cava angioplasty (PTA), stenting, thrombolysis, and combined approaches.
  • Lesions involved inferior vena cava (IVC) occlusion, stenosis, membranes, and hepatic vein (HV) involvement.

Main Results:

  • Immediate success rates were 90.1% for intervention and 100% for semi-intervention.
  • IVC pressure significantly decreased post-intervention.
  • Recurrence rates varied: 14.5% for IVC PTA, 1.7% for IVC PTA with stent, and 18.2% for combined technique without stent.

Conclusions:

  • Percutaneous transinferior vena cava angioplasty (PTA) is a primary treatment for localized lesions.
  • Stenting is recommended for cases with elastic recoil.
  • Semi-interventional methods are suitable for PTA failure and complex cases, with additional surgery needed for combined IVC and HV lesions.
Abstract