Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modern imaging methods in oncology.

M N Maisey1, J B Bingham

  • 1Division of Radiological Sciences, United Medical School, Guy's Hospital, London Bridge, England.

Acta Oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Studies on the Hemorrhagic Agent 3,3'-Methylenebis (4-Hydroxycoumarin): IV. The Pathologic Findings after the Administration of Dicumarol.

The American journal of pathology·2009
Same author

The role of FDG-PET in the management of non-small cell lung carcinoma.

Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore·2004
Same author

The urological care and outcome of pregnancy after urinary tract reconstruction.

BJU international·2004
Same author

Positron emission tomography for urological tumours.

BJU international·2003
Same author

Case of the month: A young man with a lump on the head.

The British journal of radiology·2003
Same author

Overview of clinical PET.

The British journal of radiology·2003
Same journal

Pathological characteristics and prognosis of very young patients with early breast cancer: a comparative analysis with older patients.

Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)·2026
Same journal

Recent survival trends in the most fatal cancers in the Nordic countries: gains in some but not in all.

Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)·2026
Same journal

First-in-human quantitative [¹⁵O]H₂O PET imaging of tumour blood flow at rest and during exercise in lymphoma patients.

Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)·2026
Same journal

Starshot field configuration in the linac isocentre size determination: a comparison of film and electronic portal imaging device measurements.

Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)·2026
Same journal

Perspectives on artificial intelligence-generated chronic disease risk predictions in early breast cancer: an international survey among radiation oncologists.

Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of 3D-CRT vs. VMAT for radiotherapy of whole breast with simultaneous integrated boost.

Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)·2026
See all related articles

This review highlights the crucial role of modern imaging techniques in cancer management. Understanding the strengths and weaknesses of various methods aids clinicians in selecting optimal diagnostic and treatment monitoring tools for cancer patients.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Oncology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Modern imaging is essential for cancer patient management and disease monitoring.
  • Clinicians require a thorough understanding of diverse imaging techniques for effective application.
  • Choosing the appropriate imaging modality impacts diagnosis and treatment response assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the development and principles of various cancer imaging methods.
  • To outline the strengths and weaknesses of each imaging technique with clinical examples.
  • To discuss future advancements in cancer imaging.

Main Methods:

  • Historical overview of imaging technologies from X-rays to PET and MRI.
  • Comparative analysis of different imaging modalities.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Inclusion of clinical case examples to illustrate applications.

    • Main Results:

    • Detailed explanation of imaging principles.
    • Evaluation of diagnostic and therapeutic monitoring capabilities of each method.
    • Identification of specific applications where each technique excels.

    Conclusions:

    • Clinicians can better select imaging methods by understanding their specific applications, strengths, and limitations.
    • Informed choices in imaging improve cancer diagnosis and treatment response evaluation.
    • Future developments promise enhanced capabilities in cancer imaging.