Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

DNA Microarrays02:34

DNA Microarrays

Microarrays are high-throughput and relatively inexpensive assays that can be automated to analyze large quantities of data at a time. They are used in genome-wide studies to compare gene or protein expression under two varied conditions, such as healthy and diseased states. Microarrays consist of glass or silica slides on which probe molecules are covalently attached through surface functionalization. Most commonly, the slides are prepared through the chemisorption of silanes to silica...
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Random Error01:04

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A cell atlas of the developing human outflow tract of the heart and its adult aortic valve derivatives.

eLife·2026
Same author

DeepSynBa: Actionable Drug Combination Prediction with Complete Dose-Response Profiles.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

metaAPA: a tool for integration of PolyA site predictions from single-cell and spatial transcriptomics.

Bioinformatics advances·2026
Same author

A Review of the Australian MRI Linac Program: From Pie in the Sky to Research Milestone.

Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology·2026
Same author

Molecular characterization of covRS mutations in M1<sub>UK</sub> Streptococcus pyogenes.

FEBS open bio·2026
Same author

Paired DNA and RNA sequencing uncovers common and rare variation regulating human retinal gene expression.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Correction to 'New origin firing is inhibited by APC/CCdh1 activation in S-phase after severe replication stress'.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

VeloRM: disentangling pre- and post-splicing RNA modification dynamics at single-cell resolution.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Accessibility of telomeric overhangs to stabilizing small-molecule ligands.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Multivalent interactions mediate SNAIL transcription factor stimulation of the nucleosome deacetylase activity of the CoREST complex.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Genome-wide mapping of DNA G-quadruplexes in Trypanosoma brucei chromatin reveals enrichment in coding regions and transcription start sites.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

Correction to 'The Gene Ontology knowledgebase in 2026'.

Nucleic acids research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 13, 2026

Performing Custom MicroRNA Microarray Experiments
07:04

Performing Custom MicroRNA Microarray Experiments

Published on: October 28, 2011

A model-based analysis of microarray experimental error and normalisation.

Yongxiang Fang1, Andrew Brass, David C Hoyle

  • 1School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.

Nucleic Acids Research
|August 9, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a statistical model to analyze errors in microarray experiments, developing a combined normalization strategy. Effective normalization requires addressing intensity-dependent, feature-specific, and position-dependent errors for accurate biological insights.

More Related Videos

The Terroir Concept Interpreted through Grape Berry Metabolomics and Transcriptomics
13:02

The Terroir Concept Interpreted through Grape Berry Metabolomics and Transcriptomics

Published on: October 5, 2016

Using Microarrays to Interrogate Microenvironmental Impact on Cellular Phenotypes in Cancer
08:20

Using Microarrays to Interrogate Microenvironmental Impact on Cellular Phenotypes in Cancer

Published on: May 21, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 13, 2026

Performing Custom MicroRNA Microarray Experiments
07:04

Performing Custom MicroRNA Microarray Experiments

Published on: October 28, 2011

The Terroir Concept Interpreted through Grape Berry Metabolomics and Transcriptomics
13:02

The Terroir Concept Interpreted through Grape Berry Metabolomics and Transcriptomics

Published on: October 5, 2016

Using Microarrays to Interrogate Microenvironmental Impact on Cellular Phenotypes in Cancer
08:20

Using Microarrays to Interrogate Microenvironmental Impact on Cellular Phenotypes in Cancer

Published on: May 21, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Bioinformatics
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Microarray experiments are prone to systematic errors affecting data accuracy.
  • These errors include spot intensity-dependent, feature-specific, and spot position-dependent contributions.
  • Existing normalization methods may not fully address all error types.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a statistical model for analyzing errors in two-dye microarray experiments.
  • To develop and evaluate a combined normalization regime to mitigate these errors.
  • To compare the effectiveness of different normalization techniques.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a statistical model for microarray error analysis.
  • Application of the model to two-dye microarray data sets.
  • Evaluation of adaptive normalization, self-normalization, and regional (block) normalization techniques.

Main Results:

  • Systematic errors in microarrays are intensity-dependent, feature-specific, and position-dependent.
  • Adaptive normalization excels at correcting intensity-related dye bias, while regional normalization addresses position-dependent errors.
  • Dye-flip replicates are crucial for removing feature-specific errors and identifying experimental dye bias.

Conclusions:

  • A combined normalization strategy is essential for comprehensive error removal in microarrays.
  • Adaptive normalization, when paired with effective dye bias identification, performs comparably to self-normalization.
  • Accurate error correction is vital for distinguishing experimental bias from true biological differences.