Comparison of different types of blood pool agents (P792, MS325, USPIO) in a rabbit MR angiography-like protocol

Claire Corot1, Xavier Violas, Philippe Robert

  • 1Guerbet Research, Roissy, France. corotc@guerbet-group.com

Investigative Radiology
|August 12, 2003
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Blood pool agents P792 and USPIO show favorable intravascular retention for magnetic resonance angiography. P792 offers optimal characteristics for angiographic applications due to rapid clearance and T1 effect.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Imaging
  • Pharmacokinetics
  • Magnetic Resonance Angiography

Background:

  • Blood pool agents (BPAs) are crucial for magnetic resonance angiography (MRA).
  • Understanding BPA pharmacokinetics influences MRA protocol optimization.
  • Different BPA classes exhibit distinct distribution and binding behaviors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the pharmacokinetic influence of different BPA classes on MRA.
  • To compare P792 (macromolecular), USPIO (nanoparticle), and MS-325 (gadolinium chelate) in a rabbit MRA model.
  • To assess BPA behavior during bolus and steady-state phases of distribution.

Main Methods:

  • Rabbit model simulating MRA protocol.
  • Measurement of blood Gd or Fe concentrations during the first 5 minutes postinjection.
  • Calculation of T1 relaxation times and r1 relaxivity.
  • Determination of free and bound MS-325 concentrations and apparent r1 relaxivities.

Main Results:

  • All three BPAs showed comparable profiles to Gd-DOTA during the bolus phase.
  • P792 and USPIO demonstrated similar pharmacokinetic behavior at 1 minute postinjection (C1 min/C0 ~91-92%).
  • MS-325 had the lowest C1 min/C0 value (61%) at 1 minute, with 75% in bound form and significant extravasation.

Conclusions:

  • P792 and USPIO offer optimal contrast for MRA due to intravascular retention and lack of extravasation.
  • P792 exhibits ideal blood pool characteristics for angiography, combining rapid clearance and a strong T1 effect.
  • MS-325's initial free form leads to increased tissue background signal, hindering MRA efficacy.