Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The tendering process: flaws and all.

Peter Spurgeon1, Carolyn Hicks

  • 1Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, UK. p.spurgeon@bham.ac.uk

Health Services Management Research
|August 12, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Australian doctors are more engaged than UK doctors: why is this the case?

BMJ leader·2022
Same author

Reshaping, Intermixing, and Coarsening for Metallic Nanocrystals: Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanical and Coarse-Grained Modeling.

Chemical reviews·2019
Same author

Medical engagement and improving quality of care.

Future hospital journal·2019
Same author

The Relationships Between Use of Quality-of-Care Feedback Reports on Chronic Diseases and Medical Engagement in General Practice.

Quality management in health care·2018
Same author

Creating safer health systems: Lessons from other sectors and an account of an application in the Safer Clinical Systems programme.

Health services management research·2017
Same author

The randomised controlled trial: a critique.

Nurse researcher·2016
Same journal

Sustainability accounting and reporting adoption across Italian public healthcare system: What role of the institutional pressures?

Health services management research·2026
Same journal

Thank you!

Health services management research·2026
Same journal

Enhancing job satisfaction and reducing burnout among healthcare workers: The mediating role of psychological capital before and after a targeted training intervention.

Health services management research·2026
Same journal

Global trends and emerging themes in digital human resource management in healthcare: A bibliometric analysis.

Health services management research·2026
Same journal

Enhancing collaboration and communication within nursing teams: Insights from nurses to inform health service management.

Health services management research·2026
Same journal

Why "health in all policies" matters: Insights from the EHMA 2025 conference.

Health services management research·2026
See all related articles

The traditional tendering process for research projects may not guarantee quality or value for money. An alternative preferred provider model could offer better outcomes and cost-effectiveness for public sector contracts.

Area of Science:

  • Public Administration
  • Research Management
  • Health Economics

Background:

  • Tendering is the standard method for allocating research and consultancy projects, presumed to ensure accountability and value.
  • This established process is rarely evaluated for its true resource costs or compared to alternative allocation methods.
  • Concerns exist regarding the actual quality of work and cost-effectiveness delivered through tendering.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the tendering process in research and consultancy project allocation.
  • To investigate factors potentially compromising work quality within the tendering system.
  • To assess the true economic implications of tendering for public sector organizations.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative exploration of the tendering process and its underlying assumptions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Hypothetical case study analysis involving the university and National Health Service sectors.
  • Cost-benefit analysis comparing tendering with an alternative allocative model.

    • Main Results:

    • The tendering process may not consistently yield the highest quality work or optimal value for money.
    • Data suggests the total cost to the public sector can exceed the allocated contract value.
    • Resource implications for all involved organizations are often underestimated in tendering.

    Conclusions:

    • The current tendering system for research and consultancy projects warrants critical re-evaluation.
    • An alternative preferred provider relationship-based allocation process is proposed as a superior model.
    • Implementing this alternative could enhance quality, accountability, and economic efficiency in public sector project allocation.