Related Experiment Videos
Folpet permeation through nitrile gloves.
1School of Public Health, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene
|August 12, 2003
Summary
Sol-Vex nitrile gloves provided superior protection against Folpet, demonstrating 21 times greater resistance than SafeSkin nitrile gloves in permeation tests. This highlights Sol-Vex
Area of Science:
- Occupational Health and Safety
- Analytical Chemistry
- Materials Science
Background:
- Nitrile gloves are commonly used for chemical protection.
- Folpet is a fungicide found in wettable powder formulations.
- Assessing glove permeation is critical for worker safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the protective efficacy of two nitrile glove brands against Folpet.
- To compare the permeation rates of Folpet through different nitrile glove types.
- To develop and utilize a sensitive analytical method for Folpet detection.
Main Methods:
- Utilized an ASTM type-I-PTC 600 permeation cell at 30°C.
- Developed a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and gas chromatography-electron capture detection (GC-ECD) method.
- Employed a novel pyrolysis GC-ECD technique to quantify phthalimide, a Folpet degradation product.
Main Results:
- Sol-Vex nitrile gloves showed significantly lower Folpet permeation rates (2.04 ng/cm²/min after 8 hours) compared to SafeSkin nitrile gloves (42.1 ng/cm²/min).
- Sol-Vex gloves were approximately 21 times more protective than SafeSkin gloves.
- Infrared reflectance spectroscopy indicated minimal changes in Sol-Vex gloves, confirming high chemical resistance.
Conclusions:
- Sol-Vex industrial chemical-resistant nitrile gloves offer substantial protection against aqueous Folpet emulsions.
- SafeSkin exam-type nitrile gloves demonstrated considerably higher Folpet permeation.
- The developed pyrolysis GC-ECD method is highly sensitive for detecting trace Folpet permeation.