Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of ontology development tools for bioinformatics.

Patrick Lambrix1, Manal Habbouche, Marta Pérez

  • 1Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköpings universitet, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden. patla@ida.liu.se

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|August 13, 2003
PubMed
Summary

This study compares four ontology development tools: Protégé-2000, Chimaera, DAG-Edit, and OilEd, using Gene Ontology Consortium data. Each tool has unique strengths and weaknesses, with no single system being universally superior for ontology development.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Umbilical cord blood cell transcriptional and methylation signatures at birth are associated with BPD development and chorioamnionitis: a pilot study.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Macrophage-Mediated <i>In Vivo</i> Intracellular Crystallization of Aluminum Oxyhydroxide Adjuvant in Vaccine-Induced Granulomas.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2026
Same author

Draft genome sequences of <i>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</i> strains KABP062 and KABP063 isolated from human feces.

Microbiology resource announcements·2026
Same author

Early nasal and lung transcriptomic profiles reveal pathways associated with divergent clinical outcomes following H7N1 high pathogenicity avian influenza virus infection.

Poultry science·2026
Same author

Umbilical Cord Blood Cell Transcriptional and Methylation Signatures at Birth Are Associated with BPD Development.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Early Intratracheal Budesonide to Reduce Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Extremely Preterm Infants: The Budesonide in Babies (BiB) Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA·2025

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Ontology Engineering

Background:

  • Ontologies are increasingly utilized in diverse scientific domains, notably bioinformatics.
  • Developing and maintaining complex ontologies requires specialized software tools.
  • Existing tools offer varied functionalities for ontology management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate and compare the usability and features of four prominent ontology development tools.
  • To identify the strengths and weaknesses of Protégé-2000, Chimaera, DAG-Edit, and OilEd.
  • To guide users in selecting the most appropriate tool for their specific ontology development needs.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of four ontology editors: Protégé-2000, Chimaera, DAG-Edit, and OilEd.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized ontologies from the Gene Ontology Consortium as standardized test cases.
  • Assessed tools based on criteria such as feature set, user interface, and performance.

    • Main Results:

    • Protégé-2000 offers extensive features but can have a steeper learning curve.
    • Chimaera excels in reasoning and consistency checking.
    • DAG-Edit provides a user-friendly interface for directed acyclic graph manipulation.
    • OilEd is lightweight and suitable for simpler ontology tasks.
    • No single tool demonstrated superiority across all tested aspects.

    Conclusions:

    • The selection of an ontology development tool depends on specific project requirements and user expertise.
    • Understanding the distinct advantages of each tool is crucial for efficient ontology engineering.
    • Further research could explore newer tools or specific use-case performance.