Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Truncating the dose range for methacholine challenge tests: three occupational studies.

Ilir Agalliu1, Ellen A Eisen, Russ Hauser

  • 1Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts, Lowell, MA 01854, USA.

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
|August 14, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Silicosis in the Artificial Stone Countertop Industry: An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.

Annals of the American Thoracic Society·2026
Same author

Deployment-Related Respiratory Health: Bridging the Gap between Clinical and Epidemiological Associations and Disease Mechanisms An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report.

Annals of the American Thoracic Society·2026
Same author

Development and Implementation of a Radiation Safety Screening Protocol for a Clinical Study Using Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography Imaging.

Ochsner journal·2026
Same author

Civilian Occupational Exposure to Vapors, Gas, Dust, or Fumes and Respiratory Health Among United States Military Veterans.

American journal of industrial medicine·2026
Same author

Work Practices and Respirable Crystalline Silica Exposures in Stone Countertop Fabrication Shops.

American journal of industrial medicine·2025
Same author

Military Inhalational Exposures Outside the Theater of Conflict and Chronic Respiratory Symptoms.

JAMA network open·2025

Methacholine challenge testing protocols were reanalyzed. Results show that truncating high doses of methacholine (MCh) does not alter PC(20) classifications but can exaggerate responsiveness when measured by slope.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Medicine
  • Pulmonary Function Testing

Background:

  • The methacholine challenge test (MCT) is used to assess bronchial hyperresponsiveness.
  • Previous occupational studies utilized varying methacholine concentration ranges.
  • Understanding the impact of dose range on test interpretation is crucial for accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To reanalyze three occupational studies assessing the methacholine challenge test protocol.
  • To evaluate the effect of truncating methacholine concentration ranges on responsiveness metrics (slope and PC(20)).

Main Methods:

  • Reanalysis of data from three occupational studies involving methacholine challenge tests.
  • Evaluation of responsiveness using both slope and provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC(20)).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of results with truncated versus full methacholine concentration ranges.

    • Main Results:

    • Truncating high methacholine concentrations did not alter subject classification based on PC(20) values (<8 or 16 mg/ml).
    • Responsiveness, when measured by slope, significantly increased in apprentices and auto body shop workers with dose truncation.
    • Boilermakers showed higher responsiveness than apprentices and auto body shop workers in original analyses.

    Conclusions:

    • The American Thoracic Society's recommended maximum methacholine concentration of 16 mg/ml is supported.
    • Extending the methacholine dose range beyond 16 mg/ml does not appear to increase sensitivity.
    • Stopping the methacholine challenge before 16 mg/ml may exaggerate responsiveness, particularly when measured by slope; extrapolation of data is not recommended.