Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Optimal two-stage genotyping in population-based association studies.

Jaya M Satagopan1, Robert C Elston

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021, USA. satagopj@mskcc.org

Genetic Epidemiology
|August 14, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Breast cancer and microbiome: a systematic review highlighting challenges for clinical translation.

BMC women's health·2025
Same author

A New Strategy for Evaluating the Impact of Epidemiologic Risk Factors for Cancer With Application to Melanoma.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2025
Same author

Isolating the effects of HIV infection and HIV exposure on epigenetic profiles in infants using historical data from the Mothers and Infants Cohort Study.

EBioMedicine·2025
Same author

Breast cancer beliefs and screening behaviors among South Asian immigrant women living in the United States.

BMC women's health·2025
Same author

Identifying genes associated with disease outcomes using joint sparse canonical correlation analysis-An application in renal clear cell carcinoma.

Genetic epidemiology·2024
Same author

Novel breast cancer susceptibility loci under linkage peaks identified in African ancestry consortia.

Human molecular genetics·2024

A novel two-stage approach significantly reduces the cost of investigating gene-disease associations by testing markers in stages. This method typically halves study expenses compared to traditional one-stage designs.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Statistical genetics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Investigating gene-disease associations is crucial for understanding complex traits.
  • Case-control designs are common but can be resource-intensive with numerous candidate markers.
  • Efficient strategies are needed to manage costs in large-scale genetic association studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and evaluate a cost-effective two-stage approach for gene-disease association studies.
  • To determine optimal parameters for a two-stage design that balances cost, significance, and power.
  • To compare the efficiency of the two-stage approach against a conventional one-stage design.

Main Methods:

  • A two-stage genotyping and testing strategy using a subset of samples in stage 1 and all samples in stage 2.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Derivation of analytic formulae to estimate two-stage design parameters (significance levels and power).
  • Simulation studies to evaluate the properties of the two-stage approach under various scenarios and compare with a one-stage design.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed two-stage approach can typically halve the cost of a genetic association study.
    • Optimal two-stage parameters are largely independent of marker signal strength and the total number of associated markers.
    • The method achieves desired overall significance and power comparable to a one-stage approach.

    Conclusions:

    • A two-stage strategy offers a significantly more cost-effective alternative to one-stage designs for large-scale gene-disease association studies.
    • The derived analytic formulae provide a practical tool for planning such studies.
    • This approach facilitates efficient investigation of genetic markers for complex diseases.