Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.

Anthony G Greenwald1, Brian A Nosek, Mahzarin R Banaji

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-1525, USA. agg@u.washington.edu

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
|August 15, 2003
PubMed
Summary

A new scoring method for the Implicit Association Test (IAT) significantly improves result accuracy. This enhanced algorithm addresses limitations of the conventional procedure, offering more reliable implicit measure data.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Investigating the reproducibility of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Investigating the replicability of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

Investigating the analytical robustness of the social and behavioural sciences.

Nature·2026
Same author

A framework for assessing the trustworthiness of scientific research findings.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Reply to Cummins et al.: GPT reveals cognitive dissonance that is both irrational and alarmingly humanlike.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Science becomes trustworthy by constantly questioning itself.

PLoS biology·2025

Area of Science:

  • Psychological Measurement
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Background:

  • The Implicit Association Test (IAT) is widely used to measure implicit biases.
  • Current IAT scoring often relies on the original 1998 convention.
  • Large datasets from online IATs allow for re-evaluation of scoring methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate alternative scoring algorithms for the Implicit Association Test (IAT).
  • To identify a superior IAT scoring procedure compared to the conventional method.

Main Methods:

  • Examined candidate algorithms using criteria such as correlation with self-report measures, resistance to response speed artifacts, internal consistency, and sensitivity to known influences.
  • Utilized large datasets from Internet-based demonstration IATs.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A novel algorithm demonstrated superior performance across all evaluated criteria.
  • The best-performing method integrates practice trial data, respondent latency variability, and an error penalty.

Conclusions:

  • The newly developed IAT scoring algorithm significantly outperforms the conventional procedure.
  • This improved method offers more accurate and reliable implicit association measurement.
  • Findings suggest a revised standard for reporting IAT results.