Biologic effects of surface roughness and fluorhydroxyapatite coating on osteointegration in external fixation...

The concomitant influence of surface roughness and fluorhydroxyapatite (FHA) coating of titanium (Ti) implants on bone response was investigated. For this purpose, titanium screw-shaped implants with a lower degree (Y371) and a higher degree (TiPore300) of surface roughness, coated with FHA and uncoated, were transversally inserted into the diaphyses of sheep tibiae for 12 weeks. Four sheep received Y371 (group A) and Y371 + FHA (group B) screws and four sheep received TiPore300 (group C) and TiPore300 + FHA (group D) screws. For each type of material, the morphology and microstructure of implant-facing bone were evaluated. The host bone of each tibia was used as a control. In all groups the bone tissue did not reach a complete maturation. The higher degree of roughness, perhaps due to an excessive irregularity of the surface, induced the worst osteointegration: a fibrous tissue layer between screw and new bone tissue was often present. Nevertheless, as viewed by XRD, no crystallographic change of the apatite lattice was observed in any of the implants. In contrast, the microhardness value, an index of bone mineralization, was higher in the uncoated screws and decreased progressively in the following order: group C > group A > group B > group D. The association of plasma spraying with roughness treatment constitutes a complex system that seems to interfere with bone mineralization. A chemical change of the surface, perhaps with more Ti release or more coating degradation, could be responsible for such impairment. The authors emphasize the necessity for simultaneous evaluation of surface topography and chemistry as well as an improvement in plasma-spraying and post-processing techniques and in standard procedures for materials characterization.