Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Structure-activity relationship approaches and applications.

Weida Tong1, William J Welsh, Leming Shi

  • 1Center for Toxicoinformatics, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079, USA.

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
|August 20, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Lidocaine Patches in Chinese Patients with Postherpetic Neuralgia.

Dermatology and therapy·2023
Same author

Rare tumors: a blue ocean of investigation.

Frontiers of medicine·2023
Same author

Treatment of primary cutaneous lichenoid amyloidosis with abrocitinib: A pilot study in two cases.

International journal of dermatology·2023
Same author

Adverse events of PD-(L)1 inhibitors plus anti-VEGF(R) agents compared with PD-(L)1 inhibitors alone for cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Frontiers in pharmacology·2023
Same author

CircHIPK2 facilitates phenotypic switching of vascular smooth muscle cells in hypertension.

Journal of human hypertension·2023
Same author

Clinical Features and Skin Microbiome of Tinea Scrotum: An Observational Study of 113 Cases in China.

Mycopathologia·2023
Same journal

From laboratory to the field: the role of microplastics as vectors of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in the environment.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2026
Same journal

Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) exposure assessment of Carolina wren (Thryothorus ludovicianus) and barn swallow (Hirundo rustica) eggs and nestlings collected along Snow Creek and Choccolocco Creek watersheds near Anniston, Alabama, USA.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2026
Same journal

Domestic dog exposure to glyphosate in Australia.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2026
Same journal

Toxicity of green energy by-products beryllium and tungsten to temperate freshwater species from a Global Biodiversity Hotspot.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2026
Same journal

Biomagnification of Mercury in Wolves and Their Prey in the Northwest Territories, Canada.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2026
Same journal

Can forensic aggregate exposure pathways support exposure evaluation in toxic torts?

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2026
See all related articles

Structure-activity relationship (SAR) technology is widely used in drug discovery and toxicology. This review highlights SAR advances and challenges, focusing on predicting chemical toxicity using structure-based models.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicological Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Industry
  • Computational Chemistry

Background:

  • Structure-activity relationship (SAR) techniques are increasingly vital in pharmaceutical research and toxicology.
  • Advances in software and methodologies have broadened the application of SAR.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current state of SAR technology, including its advancements and challenges.
  • To provide an overview of popular SAR methodologies used in toxicology.

Main Methods:

  • Chemical structure characterization.
  • Application of chemometric approaches (unsupervised and supervised).
  • Development of predictive models for chemical toxicity based on structure.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • SAR models, particularly supervised methods, effectively predict chemical toxicity on both ordinal and continuous scales.
  • Supervised SAR models can predict the toxicity of untested chemicals using only structural information.
  • The utility of SAR is most evident in predicting toxicity of novel chemical entities.

Conclusions:

  • SAR technology offers powerful tools for predicting chemical toxicity, aiding drug discovery and safety assessments.
  • Continued development in SAR methodologies promises further advancements in understanding chemical-biological interactions.
  • The integration of chemometrics and structural analysis is key to unlocking the full potential of SAR.