Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Learning myopia: an adaptive recency effect in category learning.

Matt Jones1, Winston R Sieck

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, USA.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|August 20, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Congruency drives "conflict adaptation" independent of conflict: Converging evidence from behavior and computational modeling.

Cognitive psychology·2026
Same author

Positive eFAST-Not so FAST.

Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open·2026
Same author

Sensitivity and Bias in Face-Emotion Labeling: Replication and Extension to Youth With Irritability and Anxiety.

JAACAP open·2026
Same author

An update to the global Critical Habitat screening layer.

Scientific data·2025
Same author

Encouraging unitary and compositional representations for relational concept learning.

Cognition·2025
Same author

Lightning Impacts on Global Forest and Carbon Dynamics: Current Understanding and Knowledge Gaps.

Global change biology·2025
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

People can learn sequential dependencies in category learning, adapting their responses to recent outcomes. This contradicts existing models, suggesting a need for updated category learning theories.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Learning
  • Decision Making

Background:

  • Recency effects (REs) are documented in memory and probability learning.
  • REs are understudied in category learning research.
  • Current models predict REs are unaffected by learning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate if recency effects adapt to task structure in category learning.
  • Test predictions of existing models versus a functional interpretation of REs.
  • Explore how sequential information is learned and incorporated into responses.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments using a classification task with autocorrelated outcome sequences.
  • Participants performed a category learning task where recent outcomes influenced the correct category.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis focused on participants' reliance on recent outcomes.

    • Main Results:

    • Recency effects adapted to the autocorrelated structure of the task, contrary to model predictions.
    • Evidence suggests participants learned and utilized sequential dependencies.
    • Experiment 2 provided insights into the learning mechanisms of sequential information.

    Conclusions:

    • Recency effects in category learning are influenced by task structure and learning.
    • Existing category learning models may need revision to incorporate sequential learning.
    • Human ability to learn sequential dependencies extends to category learning tasks.