Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2026

Preparation, Administration, and Assessment of In Vivo Tissue-Specific Cellular Uptake of Fluorescent Dye-Labeled Liposomes
Published on: July 30, 2020
Comparative bioavailability of fluoxetine after transdermal and oral administration to healthy cats
John Ciribassi1, Andrew Luescher, Kirby S Pasloske
1Chicagoland Veterinary Behavior Consultants, 1042 Mountain Glen Way, Carol Stream, IL 60188, USA.
Objective:
To determine bioavailability, pharmacokinetics, and safety for transdermal (TD) and oral administration of fluoxetine hydrochloride to healthy cats.
Animals:
12 healthy mixed-breed sexually intact 1- to 4-year-old purpose-bred cats.
Procedure:
A single-dose pharmacokinetic study involving 3 groups of 4 cats each was conducted in parallel. Fluoxetine in a formulation of pluronic lecithin organogel (PLO gel) was applied to the hairless portion of the pinnae of cats at 2 dosages (5 or 10 mg/kg), or it was administered orally in capsules at a dosage of 1 mg/kg. Plasma samples were obtained and submitted for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-mass spectrometry analysis of fluoxetine and its active metabolite, norfluoxetine.
Results:
Peak fluoxetine concentration (Cmax) was lower and time to Cmax longer for TD administration versus oral administration. Relative bioavailability of each dose administered via the TD route was 10% of the value for oral administration of the drug. Mean plasma elimination half-life after oral administration was 47 and 55 hours for fluoxetine and norfluoxetine, respectively.
Conclusions And Clinical Relevance:
This study provides evidence that fluoxetine in a 15% (wt:vol) PLO gel formulation can be absorbed through the skin of cats into the systemic circulation. However, the relative bioavailability for TD administration is approximately only 10% of that for the oral route of administration.
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability: Overview
Bioavailability: Overview
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers
