Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spatio-temporal working-memory and short-term object-location tasks use different memory mechanisms.

Hubert D Zimmer1, Harry R Speiser, Beate Seidler

  • 1Department of Psychology, Saarland University, P.O. Box 151150, Saarbrücken D-66041, Germany. huzimmer@mx.uni-saarland.de

Acta Psychologica
|August 21, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enactment and bizarreness modulate familiarity and recollection in associative recognition: Evidence from FN400 and LPC.

Neuropsychologia·2025
Same author

Task Demands Differentially Affect Processing of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Object Features in Working Memory.

Experimental psychology·2023
Same author

Unitization of internal and external features contributes to associative recognition for faces: Evidence from modulations of the FN400.

Brain research·2020
Same author

Visual Working Memory of Chinese Characters and Expertise: The Expert's Memory Advantage Is Based on Long-Term Knowledge of Visual Word Forms.

Frontiers in psychology·2020
Same author

Spatio-Temporal Neural Changes After Task-Switching Training in Old Age.

Frontiers in aging neuroscience·2019
Same author

Is the Correlation between Storage Capacity and Matrix Reasoning Driven by the Storage of Partial Solutions? A Pilot Study of an Experimental Approach.

Journal of Intelligence·2019

Investigating spatial short-term memory, this study found that neither visual nor spatial secondary tasks impaired object location memory. This suggests distinct mechanisms for recalling object configurations versus sequential spatial information.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Memory

Background:

  • Spatial short-term memory is crucial for navigating and interacting with environments.
  • Working memory models propose distinct visual and spatial components.
  • Understanding these components helps elucidate memory storage and retrieval mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the mechanisms underlying spatial short-term memory for object locations.
  • To determine whether visual or spatial secondary tasks differentially impact memory for object locations.
  • To compare memory for object locations with memory for sequential spatial information.

Main Methods:

  • A spatial relocation task was used to assess memory for object locations.
  • Visual (dynamic visual noise) and spatial (spatial tapping) secondary tasks were administered during memory maintenance.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The Corsi block-tapping task assessed spatio-temporal memory.
  • Memory for real objects versus nonsense figures was contrasted under visual interference.

    • Main Results:

    • Neither visual nor spatial secondary tasks impaired memory for object locations in the relocation task.
    • The Corsi task demonstrated a dissociation between visual and spatial components, confirming task specificity.
    • Real objects were relocated more accurately than nonsense figures, with visual interference being ineffective.
    • Spatial tapping had minimal impact on object location memory but a small effect on nonsense figure memory.

    Conclusions:

    • Spatial relocation and Corsi tasks utilize different memory mechanisms.
    • Object location memory relies on reconstructing perceptual records in an episodic buffer, not requiring active rehearsal.
    • Corsi task performance depends on spatio-temporal marking and active rehearsal, which can be disrupted by spatial secondary tasks.