Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Extrapolating ecotoxicological measures from small data sets.

David W Pennington1

  • 1Life Cycle Systems Group, GECOS, ENAC, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. david.pennington@epfl.ch

Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
|August 21, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Estimating the hazardous concentration (HC5) for ecotoxicological risk screening is robust across models. Uncertainty in HC5 estimates primarily depends on sample size and measurement relevance, not the chosen statistical model.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Life cycle thinking in waste management: summary of European Commission's Malta 2005 workshop and pilot studies.

Waste management (New York, N.Y.)·2007
Same author

Multimedia fate and human intake modeling: spatial versus nonspatial insights for chemical emissions in Western Europe.

Environmental science & technology·2005
Same author

Aquatic ecotoxicological indicators in life-cycle assessment.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2004
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Ecotoxicology
  • Environmental Risk Assessment
  • Species Sensitivity Distributions

Background:

  • Ecotoxicological risk screening commonly employs multi-species measures like the HC5 (Hazardous Concentration affecting 5% of species).
  • Accurate estimation of HC5 is crucial for environmental protection and regulatory decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the impact of different parametric models on HC5 estimates.
  • To identify key drivers of uncertainty in HC5 calculations.
  • To propose reliable sample-to-population extrapolation factors for risk assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Cross-comparison of empirical and theoretical methods for estimating uncertainty in HC5.
  • Analysis of species sensitivity distributions using various parametric models.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Investigation of the influence of sample size and measurement relevance (acute vs. chronic) on uncertainty.

    • Main Results:

    • HC5 estimates showed minimal variation across commonly used parametric models for species sensitivity distributions.
    • Uncertainty in HC5 is significantly influenced by the number of species tested (sample size) and the relevance of the ecotoxicological measurement to the assessment endpoint.
    • Certain theoretical parametric methods for HC5 confidence intervals can lead to overconservatism, especially with positive bias.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of parametric model has a limited impact on HC5 estimates in ecotoxicological risk screening.
    • Sample size and measurement relevance are critical factors determining the uncertainty of HC5.
    • The 95th percentile confidence interval for HC5 can be very wide with small sample sizes (e.g., three chronic tests), highlighting the need for careful method selection.