Confidence, not consistency, characterizes flashbulb memories
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2026

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
Published on: January 31, 2017
Jennifer M Talarico1, David C Rubin
1Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Abstract:
On September 12, 2001, 54 Duke students recorded their memory of first hearing about the terrorist attacks of September 11 and of a recent everyday event. They were tested again either 1, 6, or 32 weeks later. Consistency for the flashbulb and everyday memories did not differ, in both cases declining over time. However, ratings of vividness, recollection, and belief in the accuracy of memory declined only for everyday memories. Initial visceral emotion ratings correlated with later belief in accuracy, but not consistency, for flashbulb memories. Initial visceral emotion ratings predicted later posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. Flashbulb memories are not special in their accuracy, as previously claimed, but only in their perceived accuracy.
Related Concept Videos
Flashbulb Memory
Traumatic Memory
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
Hindsight Biases
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Implicit Memories
One key aspect of implicit...

