Comparison of transfers to Fallopian tubes or uterus after ICSI

The aim of this study was to compare the implantation rate of tubal-replaced microinjected oocytes (MIFT) versus conventional day 2 intrauterine embryo transfer in patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Sixty-three patients in need of ICSI, between 18 and 37 years of age with normal menstrual cycles and fewer than four previous ICSI attempts, were randomized between April 1999 and December 2001. In the MIFT group, up to three micro-injected oocytes were transferred laparoscopically 4 h after microinjection. In the ICSI-embryo transfer group, up to three cleaving embryos were replaced into the uterine cavity 48 h after insemination. Fifty-nine patients reached the stage of oocyte retrieval; 31 patients had a day 2 embryo transfer and 28 patients had MIFT. The ongoing clinical pregnancy and implantation rate (i.e. the total number of gestational sacs with fetal heartbeat divided by the total number of transferred embryos or micro-injected oocytes) was 35 and 24% in the ICSI-embryo transfer group and 29 and 11% in the MIFT group respectively. In conclusion, this study shows a significant decrease in implantation rate in the MIFT group (P < 0.05). In this group of patients there seems to be no advantage to tubal replacement of micro-injected oocytes.