Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2026

Assessment of Morphine-induced Hyperalgesia and Analgesic Tolerance in Mice Using Thermal and Mechanical Nociceptive Modalities
Published on: July 29, 2014
Acute antinociceptive tolerance and partial cross-tolerance to endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 given intrathecally in
Hsiang-En Wu1, Moses Darpolor, Hiroshi Nagase
1Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
The effect of pretreatment with endomorphin-1 (EM-1) or endomorphin-2 (EM-2) given intrathecally (i.t.) on the tail-flick inhibition induced by subsequent i.t. injection of EM-1 or EM-2 was studied in CD-1 mice. Pretreatment with EM-1 (32.7 nM) for 1-3 h, but not 4 h, attenuated the tail-flick inhibition induced by i.t. EM-1 (16.3 nM), while pretreatment with EM-2 (70 nM) for 0.5-1.5 h, but not 2 h, attenuated tail-flick inhibition induced by i.t. EM-2 (35 nM). EM-1 (32.7 nM) pretreatment for 1.5 h produced 5.3- and only 2.4-folds shift to the right of the dose-response curves for EM-1- and EM-2-induced tail-flick inhibition, respectively, while EM-2 (70 nM) pretreatment for 1 h caused 4.3- and 4.5-folds shift to the right for EM-2- and EM-1-induced tail-flick inhibition, respectively. Thus, mice made antinociceptive tolerant to EM-1 were partially cross-tolerant to EM-2 and mice made antinociceptive tolerant to EM-2 were completely cross-tolerant to EM-1. It is proposed that EM-1- and EM-2-induced antinociception are mediated by the stimulation of two different subtypes of mu-opioid receptors in mouse spinal cord; one subtype is stimulated by both EM-1 and EM-2, and another subtype is stimulated by EM-2.
The effect of pretreatment with endomorphin-1 (EM-1) or endomorphin-2 (EM-2) given intrathecally (i.t.) on the tail-flick inhibition induced by subsequent i.t. injection of EM-1 or EM-2 was studied in CD-1 mice. Pretreatment with EM-1 (32.7 nM) for 1-3 h, but not 4 h, attenuated the tail-flick inhibition induced by i.t. EM-1 (16.3 nM), while pretreatment with EM-2 (70 nM) for 0.5-1.5 h, but not 2 h, attenuated tail-flick inhibition induced by i.t. EM-2 (35 nM). EM-1 (32.7 nM) pretreatment for 1.5 h produced 5.3- and only 2.4-folds shift to the right of the dose-response curves for EM-1- and EM-2-induced tail-flick inhibition, respectively, while EM-2 (70 nM) pretreatment for 1 h caused 4.3- and 4.5-folds shift to the right for EM-2- and EM-1-induced tail-flick inhibition, respectively. Thus, mice made antinociceptive tolerant to EM-1 were partially cross-tolerant to EM-2 and mice made antinociceptive tolerant to EM-2 were completely cross-tolerant to EM-1. It is proposed that EM-1- and EM-2-induced antinociception are mediated by the stimulation of two different subtypes of mu-opioid receptors in mouse spinal cord; one subtype is stimulated by both EM-1 and EM-2, and another subtype is stimulated by EM-2.
More Related Videos
08:16Partial Sciatic Nerve Ligation: A Mouse Model of Chronic Neuropathic Pain to Study the Antinociceptive Effect of Novel Therapies
Published on: October 6, 2022
05:24In Vivo SiRNA Transfection and Gene Knockdown in Spinal Cord via Rapid Noninvasive Lumbar Intrathecal Injections in Mice
Published on: March 22, 2014