Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

General growth mixture modeling for randomized preventive interventions.

Bengt Muthén1, C Hendricks Brown, Katherine Masyn

  • 1Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, University of California, Moore Hall, Box 951521, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1521, USA. bmuthen@ucla.edu

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)
|August 23, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Impact of the Sources of Strength Peer Leader Program on Suicide Attempt Rates in 40 High Schools: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

School mental health·2026
Same author

Refining RDoC Using Individual-Level Task fMRI Factor Models Reveals Reproducible and Clinically Relevant Brain-Wide Motifs.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Telehealth Versus In-Person Caregiver-Mediated Behavioral Treatment for Challenging Behaviors in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: Protocol for COACH (Caregiver Outreach for Autism Coaching at Home) Randomized Controlled Trial.

JMIR research protocols·2026
Same author

Training Clinicians in Private Practice in Family-Based Treatment for Anorexia Nervosa: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Online Approaches.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Effect of Sevelamer and B. longum on Insulin Sensitivity in Participants With Obesity: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)·2026
Same author

Family vs Individual Treatment for Children With Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry·2026
Same journal

A Bayesian functional concurrent zero-inflated Dirichlet-multinomial regression model with application to infant microbiome.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Towards optimal environmental policies: policy learning under arbitrary bipartite network interference.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Multilevel functional quantile principal component analysis.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Adaptive transfer learning for time-to-event modeling with applications in disease risk assessment.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

High-dimensional test for one-sided hypotheses.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

NBSR: a Negative Binomial Softmax Regression model for microRNA-seq data analysis.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Growth mixture modeling reveals intervention effects in diverse populations. This method identifies subgroups with distinct growth trajectories, showing targeted benefits in a school-based aggression reduction trial.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Educational Research

Background:

  • Longitudinal randomized trials often exhibit unobserved heterogeneity in subject responses.
  • Standard analyses may mask differential intervention effects across distinct population subgroups.
  • Identifying subgroups with normative and non-normative growth is crucial for accurate intervention assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and illustrate growth mixture modeling (GMM) for analyzing intervention effects in longitudinal randomized trials.
  • To examine how interventions impact subgroups characterized by different developmental trajectories.
  • To identify subgroup membership and model theory-based intervention effects within these subgroups.

Main Methods:

  • Employed growth mixture modeling, a finite-mixture random effects approach, to model unobserved heterogeneity.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applied the methodology to a real-world randomized intervention study in Baltimore public schools.
  • Analyzed intervention effects on aggressive classroom behavior trajectories across identified subgroups.

    • Main Results:

    • Growth mixture modeling successfully identified distinct subgroups with varying growth trajectories.
    • The intervention demonstrated significant benefits primarily for the subgroup initially exhibiting higher levels of aggressive behavior.
    • This highlights the utility of GMM in uncovering nuanced intervention impacts masked by overall population averages.

    Conclusions:

    • Growth mixture modeling is a powerful tool for assessing intervention effects in heterogeneous longitudinal data.
    • The approach allows for a more precise understanding of which subgroups benefit from specific interventions.
    • Findings underscore the importance of considering individual growth patterns when evaluating public health and educational interventions.