Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Pitfalls of toxicological analysis.

Harald Schütz1, Freidoon Erdmann, Marcel A Verhoff

  • 1Institute of Legal Medicine, University Giessen, Frankfurter Str. 58, D-35392 Giessen, Germany. harald.f.schuetz@forens.med.uni-giessen.de

Legal Medicine (Tokyo, Japan)
|August 26, 2003
PubMed
Summary

Forensic and clinical toxicology analysis faces risks in preanalysis, measurement, and result interpretation. Addressing these pitfalls ensures accurate toxicological testing and reliable patient outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On the Possibility of retrograde calculation of blood alcohol concentrations below 0.15‰.

International journal of legal medicine·2026
Same author

Cardiac deaths with structural heart abnormalities in the young (0-49 years): a ten-year forensic autopsy review.

Forensic science, medicine, and pathology·2026
Same author

Lethal medical course of an untreated giant cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Forensic science, medicine, and pathology·2026
Same author

Factors influencing the progression of post-mortem changes between scene and autopsy.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Effectiveness of a communal, multilevel, interdisciplinary suicide prevention program.

European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists·2025
Same author

Assessment of cardiac biomarker "point-of-care" testing as postmortem diagnostic tool.

International journal of legal medicine·2025

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Toxicology
  • Clinical Toxicology
  • Analytical Chemistry

Background:

  • Pitfalls are inherent risks in forensic and clinical toxicology.
  • These risks extend beyond immunoassays to preanalytical and analytical phases.
  • Interpretation of results is also prone to errors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the diverse pitfalls in toxicological analysis.
  • To emphasize the importance of preanalysis and measurement accuracy.
  • To underscore the necessity of considering pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors for result interpretation.

Main Methods:

  • Review of potential errors in sample handling (preanalysis).
  • Identification of analytical challenges during measurement (derivatization, parameters, memory effects).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of pharmacokinetic (e.g., enzyme induction) and pharmacodynamic (e.g., tolerance) factors influencing interpretation.

    • Main Results:

    • Preanalytical steps like sampling and storage pose significant risks.
    • Analytical procedures have numerous potential sources of error.
    • Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variations complicate result interpretation.

    Conclusions:

    • Comprehensive understanding of all analysis stages is crucial for reliable toxicological data.
    • Plausibility controls, including monitoring trends, are essential for validating results.
    • Minimizing pitfalls requires vigilance throughout the entire toxicological workflow.