Related Experiment Videos
A Survey of Practice Patterns in Concussion Assessment and Management
Michael S. Ferrara1, Michael McCrea, Connie L. Peterson
1NovaCare Athletic Training Research and Education Laboratory, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Journal of Athletic Training
|August 26, 2003
Summary
Athletic trainers use various methods for concussion assessment, with clinical exams being most common. Standardized concussion assessment tools are increasingly recognized for improving return-to-play decisions.
Area of Science:
- Sports Medicine
- Neurology
- Athletic Training
Background:
- Concussion assessment in athletes is critical for safe return to play.
- Standardized methods offer potential improvements over traditional evaluations.
- Athletic trainers play a key role in sideline concussion management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify current concussion assessment methods used by athletic trainers.
- To determine the influence of assessment information on return-to-play decisions.
- To gauge athletic trainers' familiarity with standardized concussion assessment tools.
Main Methods:
- A 21-item questionnaire was administered to athletic trainers at a professional conference.
- Data from 339 valid surveys were analyzed using frequency and descriptive statistics.
- The study focused on concussion evaluation and return-to-play decision-making processes.
Main Results:
- Clinical examination (33%) and symptom checklists (15.3%) were the most frequent assessment tools.
- The Colorado Guidelines were the most utilized concussion management guidelines (28%).
- Athletic trainers (34%) and physicians (40%) primarily made return-to-play decisions, with 83.5% favoring standardized assessment.
Conclusions:
- Athletic trainers employ diverse clinical tools for concussion evaluation.
- Standardized concussion assessment methods are gaining traction among athletic trainers.
- While clinical judgment and physician collaboration remain vital, standardized tools enhance injury assessment and return-to-play guidance.