Related Experiment Videos
[Scientific periodicals: quality criteria]
Maria Cecilia Gonzaga Ferreira1, Rosaly Favero Krzyzanowski
1Programa Biblioteca Eletrônica, ProBE/ FAPESP, São Paulo, Brasil.
Pesquisa Odontologica Brasileira = Brazilian Oral Research
|August 26, 2003
Summary
This review examines historical methods for evaluating periodicals, stressing content and format quality through technical standards for global publication excellence. It summarizes key technical standards for journals and scientific articles.
Area of Science:
- Bibliometrics and Scientometrics
- Scholarly Communication Studies
Context:
- Historical overview of periodical evaluation methodologies.
- Growing importance of standardized quality assessment in academic publishing.
Purpose:
- To review historical literature on evaluating periodicals.
- To highlight the significance of technical standards for publication quality.
Summary:
- Discusses methodologies for assessing periodicals.
- Emphasizes content and format evaluation against technical standards.
- Summarizes critical technical standards for periodicals and scientific articles.
Impact:
- Aims to improve global publication quality through standardized evaluation.
- Provides a foundation for understanding the evolution of journal assessment criteria.
- Informs researchers and publishers on best practices for scientific article and periodical standards.