Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Terminology for implant prostheses.

Harel Simon1, Roy T Yanase

  • 1School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. sims1@hotmail.com

The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
|August 27, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Caries management by risk assessment care paths for prosthodontic patients: oral microbial control and management.

Dental clinics of North America·2013
Same author

Implant verification cast--a predictable restorative system in implant prosthodontics.

Journal of the California Dental Association·2010
Same author

Clinically based diagnostic wax-up for optimal esthetics: the diagnostic mock-up.

Journal of the California Dental Association·2008
Same author

Histologic evaluation of bone-implant contact of immediately loaded transitional implants after 6 to 27 months.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2005
Same author

A simplified approach to implant-supported metal-ceramic reconstruction.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2004
Same author

Prosthetic loading of the osseointegrated implant.

Journal of the California Dental Association·2004
Same journal

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Different Types of İmplant- Supported Prostheses: A Retrospective Study.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
Same journal

Soft Tissue Dehiscence and Survival of Customized CAD/CAM Titanium Subperiosteal Implants: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
Same journal

Rotational Load Fatigue Performance of Implants with Cylindrical and Conical Internal Cam-Groove Connections.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
Same journal

Robot-Assisted Zygomatic Implant Placement for Hemimaxillectomy Defect Reconstruction: A Case Series.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
Same journal

7-mm-Diameter Versus 5-mm-Diameter Immediate Post-Extraction Implants in the Molar Region: 1-Year Results from a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
Same journal

Artificial Intelligence, the Dunning-Kruger Effect, and Implant Treatment Planning.

The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants·2026
See all related articles

Standardizing terminology for implant prostheses is crucial for clear scientific communication. This study proposes uniform terms to address current inconsistencies and improve professional dialogue in prosthodontics.

Area of Science:

  • Dental Implantology
  • Prosthodontics
  • Biomaterials Science

Background:

  • Current literature reveals a lack of standardized terminology in implant prostheses.
  • Inconsistent terminology hinders effective communication among dental professionals and researchers.
  • This inconsistency can lead to misunderstandings and impede scientific progress in the field.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a system of uniform terminology for implant prostheses.
  • To enhance clarity and consistency in scientific communication within the prosthodontic field.
  • To provide a foundation for future research and clinical practice in dental implantology.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive review of existing literature on implant prosthesis terminology.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of current terminological variations and inconsistencies.
  • Development of a proposed standardized terminology based on established prosthodontic principles.

    • Main Results:

    • Identification of significant variability in the nomenclature used for implant prostheses.
    • A proposed set of uniform terms designed to be clear, concise, and clinically relevant.
    • The suggested terminology aims to bridge the gap between research and clinical application.

    Conclusions:

    • Implementing uniform terminology for implant prostheses is essential for advancing the field.
    • Standardized terms will foster better collaboration and understanding among dental professionals.
    • This initiative supports the development of more consistent and reliable research in implant prosthodontics.