Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Baseline adjustments for binary data in repeated cross-sectional cluster randomized trials.

R M Nixon1, S G Thompson

  • 1MRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 2SR, UK. richard.nixon@mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk

Statistics in Medicine
|August 27, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Value of risk scores in the decision to palliate patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

The British journal of surgery·2018
Same author

Lessons learned about prevalence and growth rates of abdominal aortic aneurysms from a 25-year ultrasound population screening programme.

The British journal of surgery·2017
Same author

Sex differences in mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the UK.

The British journal of surgery·2017
Same author

Meta-analysis of the current prevalence of screen-detected abdominal aortic aneurysm in women.

The British journal of surgery·2016
Same author

Mechanical properties derived from phase separation in co-polymer hydrogels.

Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials·2015
Same author

Polymer fluctuation lubrication in hydrogel gemini interfaces.

Soft matter·2014
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

Baseline adjustment in cluster randomized trials is valuable for precise treatment effect estimates, especially with large cluster sizes and significant baseline heterogeneity. This method effectively corrects for chance imbalances in randomized studies.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models are standard for adjusting baseline covariates in randomized controlled trials.
  • These adjustments aim to reduce bias from baseline imbalances and enhance the precision of treatment effect estimates.
  • The utility of baseline adjustment in cluster randomized trials (CRTs) with repeated cross-sectional designs and binary outcomes requires specific investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the value of cluster-level baseline adjustment in CRTs with repeated cross-sectional designs.
  • To compare the precision of treatment effect estimates with and without baseline covariate adjustment.
  • To assess the impact of cluster size and baseline heterogeneity on the effectiveness of adjustment.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized logistic regression models with cluster-level random effects for analyzing binary outcomes in a CRT.
  • Incorporated a cluster-level covariate representing baseline probabilities for adjustment.
  • Compared treatment effect estimates and their precision between adjusted and unadjusted models using two real-world datasets and a simulation study.

Main Results:

  • Baseline adjustment proved beneficial primarily when the number of subjects per cluster was large.
  • Increased precision of the treatment effect estimate was observed with both large cluster sizes and substantial baseline heterogeneity between clusters.
  • The simulation study confirmed that baseline adjustments effectively correct for chance imbalances introduced during randomization.

Conclusions:

  • Cluster-level baseline adjustment can enhance the precision of treatment effect estimates in CRTs with repeated cross-sectional designs.
  • The benefits of adjustment are most apparent under conditions of large cluster sizes and significant baseline heterogeneity.
  • This approach provides an effective method for mitigating the impact of random baseline imbalances in CRTs.