Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Do noncontingent vouchers increase drug use?

Jennifer R Schroeder1, Anne E Gupman, David H Epstein

  • 1Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21224, USA. jschroed@intra.nida.nih.gov

Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
|August 28, 2003
PubMed
Summary

This study examined if free vouchers for drug users unintentionally increased substance use. Results suggest that receiving vouchers unrelated to drug test outcomes did not cause more drug use, except for a slight increase in cocaine use.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Daily motivation for and perceived accessibility of nondrug reward among people in long-term recovery from opioid use disorder.

Drug and alcohol dependence·2026
Same author

Between- and within-person predictors of missingness in intensive longitudinal data among people in outpatient treatment for opioid use disorder.

Psychological assessment·2026
Same author

Impaired olfactory function in substance use disorder.

Psychopharmacology·2025
Same author

Association of behavioral economic demand for kratom with DSM-5 use disorder: quantity and likelihood-based demand approaches.

Addictive behaviors reports·2025
Same author

IMPAIRED OLFACTORY FUNCTION IN SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same author

Looking beyond traditional pain outcomes to better evaluate cannabis's true potential and limitations in chronic pain management.

Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology·2025

Area of Science:

  • Addiction research
  • Behavioral economics
  • Psychopharmacology

Background:

  • Contingency management (CM) is an evidence-based intervention for substance use disorders.
  • A key component of CM involves providing tangible rewards (vouchers) for verified abstinence.
  • Concerns exist that noncontingent provision of rewards might inadvertently reinforce drug use.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether noncontingent voucher provision inadvertently reinforces drug use in individuals undergoing treatment for opiate or cocaine dependence.
  • To assess the dose-response and temporal associations between noncontingent voucher receipt and drug-positive urinalysis results.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of data from two randomized controlled trials targeting opiate and cocaine use.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Control groups received vouchers independent of urinalysis outcomes, matched in value and frequency to experimental groups.
  • Voucher delivery occurred thrice weekly for 8 weeks (opiates) or 12 weeks (cocaine).
  • Main Results:

    • Overall, drug use was not significantly associated with the frequency of noncontingent voucher delivery or receipt.
    • An exception was observed in the cocaine study, where a small but statistically significant increase in cocaine use was linked to noncontingent voucher receipt (RR=1.05).
    • When drug-positive results were unassociated with subsequent risk, noncontingent voucher receipt did not correlate with increased drug use.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings do not support a causal relationship between noncontingent voucher receipt and increased drug use in the context of these trials.
    • While a slight association was noted for cocaine use, the overall evidence suggests noncontingent vouchers are unlikely to inadvertently reinforce drug use.
    • Further research may be warranted to explore the specific mechanisms and contexts influencing voucher reinforcement.