Evaluation of wrist and hand handicap and postoperative outcome in rheumatoid arthritis

Functional instruments in rheumatology should use standardized procedures and should be quantifiable, valid, reliable, and responsive/sensitive to change. For most assessment tools, these aspects have been considered and tested. One of the most important questions in assessing hand involvement in patients with RA is what the single assessment should be used for. There could be a substantial difference should hand assessment be done in a routine way in a hand practice or should it be performed within scientific studies on disease progression or the effect of operative interventions. Among other points, answering this question has a significant impact on the time the patient has to spend with the tests and on the time the hand therapist or hand surgeon is involved with it. In addition to aspects such as accuracy, reliability, and validity, therefore, in some evaluation tools the time needed to perform the clinical examination and assessment of hand function has also been considered to be of importance. In addition, it has to be considered that description of the anatomic status, measurements of impairment, and assessment of disability cannot simply be replaced by each other, and even measurements of single aspects often are not sufficient. It has been stated, therefore, that the combination of different discrete hand-function assessment methods provides a more complete picture of hand ability. Moreover, although better responsiveness of disability outcome measures over impairment measures has been demonstrated previously (eg, in patients treated for Colle fracture), the relationship between disability and impairment measures is not clearly established. Although some studies reported significant correlations between impairment and disability tests, other studies showed only poor or moderate correlations between disability scores, impairment, and disease activity measures when rheumatoid hands were assessed. It has been concluded that the relationship between impairment and disability is not straightforward. The new ICF-model addresses these two levels of health-related quality of life by different concepts of assessment. Because impairment reflects the consequences of the disease at the organ level, whereas disability reflects the consequences of the disease for functional performance and activity, for comprehensive assessment of hand handicap, measurement of disability is more comprehensive and closer to the patient's needs for performing ADLs.