Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Phase resetting effects for robust cycles between chaotic sets.

Peter Ashwin1, Michael Field, Alastair M Rucklidge

  • 1School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QE, United Kingdom. P.Ashwin@ex.ac.uk

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)
|August 30, 2003
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An Integrated Approach to Reclassify MEN1 Variants of Uncertain Significance Using Clinical and Computational Evidence.

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2026
Same author

BIRC3 (Encoding Cellular Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein 2) Variants Result in Dysregulated Receptor-Interacting Protein Kinase 1 Signaling Leading to Increased Epithelial Cell Death and Are Associated With Monogenic Crohn's Disease.

Gastroenterology·2026
Same author

GPR15-guided CD8<sup>+</sup> T regulatory cells control intestinal inflammation.

Nature·2026
Same author

Author Correction: Biallelic variants in the noncoding RNA gene RNU4-2 cause a recessive neurodevelopmental syndrome with distinct white matter changes.

Nature genetics·2026
Same author

Chaotic variability in a model of coupled ice streams.

Physical review. E·2026
Same author

Digital Transformation of Rural, Regional, and Remote Australian Hospitals: A Pragmatic Strategy for Introducing AI.

The Australian journal of rural health·2026
Same journal

Topological dependence of viral mutation spread in complex host-interaction networks.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Multifractal signatures of Hamiltonian chaos in Hyperion's rotational dynamics.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Exploring mechanisms for reversal of flow in tunicate hearts.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

State estimation in spatiotemporal chaos via low-rank StatFEM.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Universal response functions in driven dissipative tunneling dynamics.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

A network-based approach to characterize the dynamics of the coupling field of thermoacoustic oscillators in annular geometry.

Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)·2026
See all related articles

This study examines how complex systems can exhibit stable, repeating patterns of movement between different chaotic states. The authors analyze a specific mathematical model to understand how these cycles persist and how they might break down under certain conditions.

Area of Science:

  • Nonlinear dynamics and phase resetting phenomena in complex systems
  • Mathematical physics and chaos theory research

Background:

No prior work had fully resolved the mechanisms governing robust cycles between chaotic sets in systems with invariant subspaces. Researchers have long observed that symmetry often complicates the behavior of attractors in dynamical systems. That uncertainty drove interest in how interactions with invariant subspaces generate chaotic itinerancy. It was already known that heteroclinic cycles between simple equilibrium points represent the most basic form of these patterns. This gap motivated a deeper investigation into cycles involving more complex, chaotic invariant sets. Prior research has shown that these structures can emerge in various ordinary differential equations. However, the specific conditions for maintaining robust cycling behavior remained poorly understood. This paper addresses these challenges by providing an instructive example of a system exhibiting such complex dynamics.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this study is to introduce and analyze an instructive example of an ordinary differential equation that exhibits robust cycling behavior. Researchers seek to clarify the mechanisms that allow attractors to become complicated through interactions with invariant subspaces. The authors intend to distinguish between cycling that includes phase resetting connections and more general non-resetting cases. They address the problem of connection selection, which arises when multiple trajectories exist between invariant sets. The work aims to relate the instability of cycling to resonances of Lyapunov exponents. Another objective involves exploring the conjecture that phase resetting cycles lead to stable periodic orbits at instability. The study also intends to highlight the risks of interpreting numerical simulations when return times are long. This investigation provides a framework for understanding how chaotic saddles and saddle equilibria interact to form robust cycles.

Keywords:
dynamical systemsLyapunov exponentschaotic itinerancyinvariant subspacesRössler system

Frequently Asked Questions

The researchers propose that phase resetting cycles typically transition into stable periodic orbits at the point of instability, whereas non-resetting scenarios often result in a stuck-on state where trajectories remain trapped.

The authors utilize an ordinary differential equation model where the internal dynamics of the chaotic saddles are governed by a Rössler system to analyze robust cycling behavior.

A resonance of Lyapunov exponents is necessary to trigger the instability of the cycling behavior, which the authors relate to the observed transition in periodic orbits.

Positive Lyapunov exponents serve as a critical diagnostic tool, as they indicate that numerical simulations with long return times require careful interpretation to avoid errors in connection selection.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

The review approach involves analyzing a specific ordinary differential equation designed to exhibit robust cycling between invariant sets. Researchers employ a framework that incorporates chaotic saddles to represent the internal dynamics of the system. The team evaluates the distinction between scenarios featuring single connecting trajectories and those with a continuum of connections. They investigate the stability of these cycles by examining the influence of Lyapunov exponent resonances. The methodology focuses on identifying the conditions under which trajectories select specific connections within the system. Investigators utilize numerical simulations to observe the behavior of attracted trajectories over extended periods. The approach emphasizes the challenges posed by positive Lyapunov exponents when return times become significantly long. This systematic evaluation provides a clear basis for interpreting the complex interactions between invariant subspaces.

Main Results:

The strongest finding indicates that phase resetting cycles typically lead to stable periodic orbits when they reach instability. The authors demonstrate that robust cycles can exist between invariant sets, including chaotic saddles and saddle equilibria. Their analysis reveals that non-resetting cases may contain an infinite number or even a continuum of connections between sets. The study identifies that resonances of Lyapunov exponents drive the instability of these cycling patterns. The researchers report that positive Lyapunov exponents within the chaotic saddle necessitate extreme care during numerical simulation. They observe that connection selection becomes a primary concern for typical attracted trajectories in non-resetting scenarios. The findings show that the internal dynamics of the chaotic saddles correspond to a Rössler system. The evidence suggests that the presence of invariant subspaces is a primary factor in the emergence of these complex, robust attractors.

Conclusions:

The authors suggest that phase resetting cycles typically lead to stable periodic orbits when they reach instability. They propose that non-resetting scenarios might instead result in a stuck-on cycling behavior. The researchers demonstrate that resonances of Lyapunov exponents can trigger instability within these systems. Their analysis highlights the necessity of caution when interpreting numerical simulations with long return times. They argue that positive Lyapunov exponents within chaotic saddles complicate the observation of these cycles. The study implies that connection selection remains a significant issue for trajectories in non-resetting cases. These findings clarify the distinction between systems with single connecting trajectories and those with infinite connections. The work synthesizes how structural properties dictate the long-term stability of chaotic itinerancy in symmetric systems.

The study measures the number of connecting trajectories, distinguishing between cases with a single trajectory and those possessing an infinite continuum of connections.

The authors claim that the presence of positive Lyapunov exponents within the chaotic saddle can critically influence the accuracy of connection selection in numerical models.